CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesAnthropological Studies and Insights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Archaeological Ethnography: A Multitemporal Meeting Ground for Archaeology and Anthropology

Hamilakis, Yannis·2011·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145732
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Archaeology and anthropology, despite their commonalities, have had a rather asymmetrical relationship, and the periodic attempts at closer collaboration resulted in mutual frustration. As both disciplines have recently undergone significant changes, however, with anthropology embracing more fully materiality and historicity, and archaeology engaging in contemporary research, often involving ethnography, the time is ripe for a new rapprochement. Archaeological ethnography, an emerging transdisciplinary field, offers such an opportunity. Archaeological ethnography is defined here as a transcultural space for multiple encounters, conversations, and interventions, involving researchers from various disciplines and diverse publics, and centered around materiality and temporality. It is multitemporal rather than presentist, and although many of its concerns to date are about clashes over heritage, this article argues that its potential is far greater because it can dislodge the certainties of conventional archaeology and question its ontological principles, such as those founded on modernist, linear, and successive temporality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145732

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Allen H, 2010, Bridging the Divide: Indigenous Communities and Archaeology in the 21st Century
  2. Bartu A., 2000, Towards a Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük, 101
  3. Bartu Candan A. 2005. Entanglements/encounters/engagements with prehistory: Çatalhöyük and its publics. See Hodder 2005, pp. 27–38
  4. Brown B, 2004, Things
  5. Caftantzoglou R., 2001, Sti Skia tou Ierou Vrahou: Topos kai Mnimi sta Anaphiotika (In the Shadow of the Sacred Rock: Place and Memory at Anaphiotika)
  6. Castañeda QE., 1996, In the Museum of Maya Culture. Touring Chichén Itzá.
  7. Castañeda QE. 2008. The “ethnographic turn” in archaeology: research positioning and reflexivity in ethnographic archaeologies. See Castañeda & Matthews 2008, pp. 25–61
  8. Clifford J., 1997, Routes
  9. Clifford J., 2003, On the Edges of Anthropology
  10. Deleuze G., 1991, Bergsonism
  11. Duke P. 2006. Knossos as memorial, ritual, and metaphor. See Hamilakis & Momigliano 2006, pp. 79–88
  12. Edgeworth M. 2010. On the boundary: new perspectives from ethnography of archaeology. See Garrow & Yarrow 2010, pp. 53–68
  13. Fahlander F, 2010, Making Sense of Things: Archaeologies of Sensory Perception
  14. Hamilakis Y. 2007a. From ethics to politics. See Hamilakis & Duke 2007, pp. 15–40
  15. Hamilakis Y, Anagnostopoulos A. 2009b. What is archaeological ethnography? See Hamilakis & Anagnostopoulos 2009a, pp. 65–87 · DOI
  16. Hamilakis Y, 2006, Archaeology and European Modernity: Producing and Consuming the “Minoans”
  17. Harrison R, 2009, Archaeol.: J. World Archaeol. Cong., 5
  18. Hodder I, 2005, Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons
  19. Hollowell J. 2009. Standpoints of stewardship in a global market for the material past. See Hollowell & Mortensen 2009a, pp. 218–39
  20. Hollowell J, Mortensen L. 2009b. Introduction: ethnographies and archaeologies. See Hollowell & Mortensen 2009a, pp. 1–17
  21. Lane K, 2005, Archaeol. Rev. Camb., 20, 111
  22. Latour B., 2005, Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, 14
  23. Lucas G. 2010. Triangulating absence: exploring the fault-lines between archaeology and anthropology. See Garrow & Yarrow 2010, pp. 28–39
  24. Meskell L, 2005, Embedding Ethics
  25. Mortensen L. 2005.Constructing heritage at Copán Honduras: an ethnography of the archaeology industry. PhD thesis, Indiana Univ.
  26. Olivier L., 1999, Glyfer och arkeologiska rum- en vänbok till Jarl Nordbladh, 529
  27. Olivier L., 2008, Le Somber Abîme du Temps
  28. Pratt ML., 1991, Profession, 91, 33
  29. Rathje WL., 1979, Adv. Archaeol. Method Theory, 2, 1
  30. Schofield J., 2009, Br. Archaeol., 104, 44
  31. Shankland D., 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–1995, 349
  32. Solomon E. 2006. Social uses of a monumental landscape. See Hamilakis & Momigliano 2006, pp. 145–82
  33. Stefanou E. 2008.Aspects of identity and nationhood: commemorating, representing and replicating the Greek maritime past. PhD thesis, Univ. Southampton
  34. Stroulia A., 2002, Aegean Archaeol., 4, 101
  35. Watson PJ., 1979, Archaeological Ethnography in Western Iran
  36. Yarrow T. 2010. Not knowing as knowledge: asymmetry between archaeology and anthropology. See Garrow & Yarrow 2010, pp. 13–27
  37. Zimmerman LZ. 2008. Real people or reconstructed people? Ethnocritical archaeology, ethnography, and community building. See Castañeda & Matthews 2008, pp. 183–204
  38. Zorzin N., 2011, Archaeol. Rev. Camb., 26, 119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hamilakis, Y.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Hamilakis, Yannis
ORCID
Hamilakis, Yannis
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2011-10-21
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
399-414
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145732
OpenAlex
W2121441457
Cited by
170
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
archaeological ethnography, transdisciplinarity, materiality, temporality, multitemporality, heritage conflicts, contemporary archaeology, transcultural encounters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review