Cited by 135Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evolutionary anthropological perspective on modern human origins.

Open access
Marean, Curtis W.·2015·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

Modern humans are an anomaly in evolution, and the final key features occurred late in human evolution. Ultimate explanations for this evolutionary trajectory are best attained through synthetic studies that integrate genetics, biological anthropology, and archaeology, all resting firmly in the field of evolutionary anthropology. These fields of endeavor typically operate in relative isolation. This synthetic overview identifies the three pillars of human uniqueness: an evolved advanced cognition, hyperprosociality, and psychology for social learning. These properties are foundational for cumulative culture, the dominant adaptation of our species. Although the Homo line evolved in the direction of advancing cognition, the evidence shows that only modern humans evolved extreme levels of prosociality and social learning; this review offers an explanation. These three traits were in place ∼200–100 ka and produced a creature capable of extraordinary social and technological structures, but one that was also empowered to make war in large groups with advanced weapons. The advance out of Africa and the annihilation of other hominin taxa, and many unprepared megafauna, were assured.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025954

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 170 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ames CJH, 2013, Can. J. Archaeol., 37, 21
  2. Crabtree DE, 1964, Tebiwa, 7, 1
  3. Marean CW, 2005, African Archaeology, 93
  4. Soressi M, 2008, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr., 47, 95
  5. Wadley L, 2003, South Afr. J. Sci., 99, 247

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marean, C. W.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Marean, Curtis W.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2015-10-21
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
533-556
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W2109990105
Cited by
135
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
modern human origins, human evolution, social learning, cumulative culture, Homo, Out of Africa, hominin extinction, megafaunal extinction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review