The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Defense Against Herbivores: Chemical Aspects
Abstract
Plants have evolved a plethora of different chemical defenses covering nearly all classes of (secondary) metabolites that represent a major barrier to herbivory: Some are constitutive; others are induced after attack. Many compounds act directly on the herbivore, whereas others act indirectly via the attraction of organisms from other trophic levels that, in turn, protect the plant. An enormous diversity of plant (bio)chemicals are toxic, repellent, or antinutritive for herbivores of all types. Examples include cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, alkaloids, and terpenoids; others are macromolecules and comprise latex or proteinase inhibitors. Their modes of action include membrane disruption, inhibition of nutrient and ion transport, inhibition of signal transduction processes, inhibition of metabolism, or disruption of the hormonal control of physiological processes. Recognizing the herbivore challenge and precise timing of plant activities as well as the adaptive modulation of the plants' metabolism is important so that metabolites and energy may be efficiently allocated to defensive activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles
Langenheim, J. H. (1994) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02059809 · Cited by 878
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Phytoecdysteroids: Biological aspects
Dinan, L. (2001) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00078-4 · Cited by 392 · cited 1×
“Phytoecdysteroids (Figure 3) represent a group of plant compounds that mimic insect hormones, ecdysteroids (including ecdyson), and interfere with the regulation of the periodical molting process (40).”
BackgroundSaponins and plant defence — a soap story
Osbourn, A. (1996) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(96)80016-1 · Cited by 382
Selenium hyperaccumulation offers protection from cell disruptor herbivores
Quinn, C. F., Freeman, J. L., Reynolds, R. J., Cappa, J. J., Fakra, S. C., Marcus, M. A., Lindblom, S. D., Quinn, E. K., Bennett, L. E., & Pilon-Smits, E. A. (2010) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-10-19 · Cited by 112
Cited by
A Review of Dietary Phytochemicals and Their Relation to Oxidative Stress and Human Diseases
Guan, R., Van Le, Q., Yang, H., Zhang, D., Gu, H., Yang, Y., Sonne, C., Lam, S. S., Zhong, J., Jianguang, Z., et al. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129499 · Cited by 169
Plant–arthropod interactions: who is the winner?
Stahl, E., Hilfiker, O., & Reymond, P. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13773 · Cited by 164
A Latex Metabolite Benefits Plant Fitness under Root Herbivore Attack
Huber, M., Epping, J., Schulze Gronover, C., Fricke, J., Aziz, Z., Brillatz, T., Swyers, M., Köllner, T. G., Vogel, H., Hammerbacher, A., et al. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002332 · Cited by 97
Huang, W., Bont, Z., Hervé, M. R., Robert, C. A. M., & Erb, M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-019-01126-9 · Cited by 27
Matsunaga, T., Reisenman, C. E., Goldman-Huertas, B., Rajshekar, S., Suzuki, H. C., Tadres, D., Wong, J., Louis, M., Ramírez, S. R., & Whiteman, N. K. (2025) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf164 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mithöfer, A., & Boland, W.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-06-02
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 431-450
- ISSN
- 1543-5008 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2123
- OpenAlex
- W2158718877
- Cited by
- 1,610
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
