The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality Disorders in DSM-5
Abstract
A substantive revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) last occurred in 1994; therefore, the mental health field should anticipate significant changes to the classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition. Since DSM-5 Work Groups have recently proposed revisions for the major diagnostic classes of mental disorders, an article on the current status of the personality disorders (PDs) is timely. This article reviews scientific principles that have influenced the development of proposed changes for the assessment and diagnosis of personality psychopathology in DSM-5, presents the proposed model as of the summer of 2011, summarizes rationales for the changes, and discusses critiques of the model. Scientific principles were articulated for DSM-5 more than a decade ago; their application to the process has not been straightforward, however. Work Group members have labored to improve the DSM-5 approach to personality and PDs to make the classification more valid and more clinically useful. The current model continues to be a work in progress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The chair of the work group said that it was reinstated due, in part, to the comments posted on the official website “bemoaning its deletion as a specific PD” (Skodol 2012, p. 331).”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Skodol 2012
In the citing paper
“Both the DSM-5 (Section III) (1) and the ICD-11 (13) recommend using a hybrid model of diagnosis, which combines the categorical and dimensional models, because this combination has the strongest predictive validity (9, 14).”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 · Cited by 2,792
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Ozer, D. J., & Benet‐Martínez, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · Cited by 2,307
Establishment of Diagnostic Validity in Psychiatric Illness: Its Application to Schizophrenia
ROBINS, E., & GUZE, S. B. (1970) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.126.7.983 · Cited by 2,243
Public health significance of neuroticism
Lahey, B. B. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0015309 · Cited by 1,901
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158668 · Cited by 1,645
The maturing architecture of the brain's default network
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Barch, D. M., Raichle, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800376105 · Cited by 1,314
Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses.
Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4 · Cited by 1,294
Reich, J. W., Zautra, A., & Hall, J. S. (2010) · Cited by 1,291
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Costa PT, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual
- First MB, 1997, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II)
- Livesley WJ, 2000, Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology
- Rounsaville BJ, 2002, A Research Agenda for DSM-V, 1
- Skodol AE, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 381
- Tellegen A, 1994, Personality Measures: Development and Evaluation, 1, 133
- Torgersen S, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 83
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 359
Approach–Avoidance Theories of Personality
Corr, P. J., & Krupıć, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.025 · Cited by 12
Five Failures and Five Challenges for Prevention and Early Intervention for Personality Disorder
Chanen, A. M., & Nicol, K. (2022) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.22020016 · Cited by 9
Gilmartin, T. L., Gurvich, C., Dipnall, J. F., & Sharp, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113142 · Cited by 9
“The inclusion of pathological trait domains was designed to assign a diagnosis that fits the specific patient (Skodol, 2012).”
BackgroundLes troubles de la personnalité dans le DSM-5
Guelfi, J. D. (2014) · Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique · doi:10.1016/j.amp.2014.08.007 · Cited by 8
Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.038 · Cited by 9
Attachment, mentalization, and the self
Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 8
Thimm, J. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1673139 · Cited by 8
Labonté, L. E., & Kealy, D. (2023) · Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic · doi:10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.266 · Cited by 9
Mentalization based treatment for a broad range of personality disorders: a naturalistic study
Rizzi, E., Weijers, J. G., ten Kate, C., & Selten, J. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05865-2 · Cited by 9
“The DSM’s [1] categorical approach to diagnosing PDs has been a cornerstone of psychiatric classification; however, it faces increasing scrutiny for its rigidity and reductionism as it neglects the dimensional and dynamic nature of PDs [28, 29].”
BackgroundSteroid Regulation of T Cell Function Appears Unaltered in Borderline Personality Disorder
Fischer, A., Grundmann, J., Gold, S. M., Spitzer, C., & Wingenfeld, K. (2014) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_156 · Cited by 7
Arbisi, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.866571 · Cited by 7
Bornstein, R. F. (2013) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.296 · Cited by 7
“These include the formal proposal offered by the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders (PPD) Work Group (see Skodol, 2012), and the Personality (P) Axis of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations, 2006).”
MethodConceptual and Historical Perspectives
Cloninger, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.004 · Cited by 8
Hopwood, C. J., Schwaba, T., Wright, A. G. C., Bleidorn, W., & Zanarini, M. C. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070211012918 · Cited by 7
Diagnostic Systems and Models: DSM-5 Criteria, ICD-11 Guidelines, and Dimensional Horizons
Bach, B., Bo, S., & Keeley, J. W. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00111-4 · Cited by 7
Bornstein, R. F. (2016) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.1342 · Cited by 7
Kolbeck, K., Moritz, S., Bierbrodt, J., & Andreou, C. (2018) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2018_32_346 · Cited by 8
Carlson, E. N., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2018) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2018.32.3.374 · Cited by 9
Assessing Personality Pathology Response Sets in Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence
McDonagh, T., Travers, Á., Murphy, S., & Elklit, A. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211001482 · Cited by 7
Personality, Preferences and Socioeconomic Behavior
Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.044 · Cited by 6
Ishfaq, N., & Kamal, A. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-11-2021-0043 · Cited by 7
Haggerty, G., Stein, M. B., Siefert, C. J., Zodan, J., Mehra, A., Ogbuji, K., Sangha, J., Habib, M., Sinclair, S. J., & Blais, M. A. (2018) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2193 · Cited by 7
Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders Through the Lens of an Empirical Network Model
Díaz, C., Aluja, A., Sayans‐Jiménez, P., Baillés, E., Fernández‐Calderón, F., Peri, J. M., Vall, G., Lozano, O. M., & Gutiérrez, F. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191119897118 · Cited by 7
“…conceptualization (Luyten & Blatt, 2011), the high comorbidity between disorders, the poor foundation of the cutoff points for establishing the diagnoses, or the excessive use of the “unspecified PD” category (Skodol, 2012; Verheul, & Widiger, 2004; Widiger & Samuel, 2005; Widiger & Trull, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodFowler, J. C., Carlson, M. M., Orme, W. H., Allen, J. G., Oldham, J. M., Madan, A., & Frueh, B. C. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.138 · Cited by 6
Fard, Z. G., Pourshahbaz, A., Anderson, J. L., Boland, J. K., Shakiba, S., & Mirabzadeh, A. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01751-2 · Cited by 6
“…in an effort to preserve clinical continuity in the transition to this model from the Section II categorical model, making the AMPD a hybrid between dimensional and categorical models rather than a strictly dimensional system of assessment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Skodol, 2012).”
MethodTemperament and Brain Networks of Attention
Rothbart, M. K., Posner, M. I., & Sheese, B. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.016 · Cited by 8
Biesanz, J. C., & Wallace, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.006 · Cited by 7
The DSM-5 Dimensional Trait Model and the Five Factor Model
Gore, W. L. (2013) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 6
DSM-5 and personality disorders: where did axis II go?
Trestman, R. L. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 6
Five Factor Model of Personality, Personality Disorder
Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.25065-4 · Cited by 6
Narcissism - Oxford Handbook of PDsPreprint
Crowe, M. L., Weiss, B., Lynam, D. R., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/3e476 · Cited by 6
Diagnostic validity of millon clinical multiaxial inventory-IV (MCMI-IV)
Mohammadi, M. R., Hooshyari, Z., Delāvar, A., Amanat, M., Mohammadi, A., Abasi, I., & Salehi, M. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02972-9 · Cited by 6
“There are various psychological assessment tools developed to diagnose co-morbid personality disorders (PDs) (Widiger, 2011) but high-quality tools are lacking (Kupfer et al., 2008; Skodol, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialSpangenberg, H., Ramklint, M., & Ramirez, A. (2023) · Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.48101/ujms.v128.9014 · Cited by 5
Too few or too many? Reactions to removing versus retaining specific personality disorders in DSM-5
Pull, C. B. (2012) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e32835b2cb5 · Cited by 5
Aberrant personality tendencies and academic success throughout engineering education
Bipp, T., Kleingeld, A., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2019) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12479 · Cited by 7
“We focused on six APT (following Wille et al., 2013)—a selection out of the 10 personality disorders included in the DSM‐5: schizotypal, avoidant, borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, and obsessive‐ compulsive tendencies.”
BackgroundPersonality in Clinical Psychology
Widiger, T. A., & McCabe, G. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.042 · Cited by 5
States and Situations, Traits and Environments
Asendorpf, J. B., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.007 · Cited by 10
Wu, L. Z., Asan, A. E., Halberstadt, A. L., & Pincus, A. L. (2021) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2021.1960359 · Cited by 5
“Many investigators and clinicians suggest that personality disorders are fundamentally impairments in relations between self and other (Pincus et al., 2020; Skodol, 2012).”
BackgroundShalit, N., Rehm, J. T., & Lev‐Ran, S. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.041 · Cited by 6
Samuel, D. B., Connolly, A. J., & Ball, S. A. (2012) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191112444461 · Cited by 5
Furnham, A. F., & Petropoulou, K. (2017) · Journal of Relationships Research · doi:10.1017/jrr.2017.3 · Cited by 5
la Rosa-Cáceres, A. D., Sayans‐Jiménez, P., Stasik-O’Brien, S. M., Sánchez‐García, M., Fernández‐Calderón, F., & Díaz, C. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02907-4 · Cited by 4
“These systems, which use polythetic criteria, establish categorical classifications according to an observed set of symptoms, resulting in patients with different symptoms receiving the same diagnosis (Skodol, 2012).”
BackgroundPersonality disorders, fact or fiction? The dark future of their diagnosis
Caballo, V. E., López, A., & Salazar, I. C. (2024) · Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual · doi:10.51668/bp.8324101n · Cited by 4
Gilmartin, T. L., Gurvich, C., Dipnall, J. F., & Sharp, G. (2025) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01204-2 · Cited by 5
“…pathological personality traits provided us with the opportunity to understand the personality types construct using a model of personality pathology that is associated with a contemporary understanding of personality pathology (Busch, Morey, & Hopwood, 2017; Skodol, 2012; Thylstrup et al., 2016.”
The Pregnancy Obsession-Compulsion-Personality Disorder Symptom Checklist
van Broekhoven, K. E. M., & Hartman, E. (2016) · Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000233 · Cited by 3
Publications on personality disorders in Brazilian journals: a narrative review
Carvalho, L. D. F., Gomes, G. V. A., & da Silva, E. (2021) · Revista Avaliação Psicológica · doi:10.15689/ap.2021.2003.17990.11 · Cited by 4
The National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria
Sanislow, C. A., Morris, S. E., Pacheco, J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2020) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198713005.003.0008 · Cited by 5
Das alternative Modell für Persönlichkeitsstörungen in DSM-5
Berberich, G., & Zaudig, M. (2015) · Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-015-0322-7 · Cited by 4
Widiger, T. A., & Rojas, S. L. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118753378.ch84 · Cited by 4
Hemmati, A., Nazari, A., Sharp, C., & Komasi, S. (2025) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2025.2545323 · Cited by 3
“The AMPD’s Criterion A, emphasizes impairments in self and interpersonal functioning as central to the definition of personality disorders (Bender et al., 2011; Skodol, 2012).”
Paris, J. (2015) · Annals of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/104012371502700108 · Cited by 4
Personality Traits and Mental Disorders
Hakulinen, C. A., Jokela, M. M., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Elovainio, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.018 · Cited by 4
Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Dysfunction
Eysenck, M. W., & Holmes, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.033 · Cited by 3
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Moscoso, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.040 · Cited by 4
When the Others Are Dangerous: Paranoid Presentations in Subclinical Forms of Personality Disorders
Fanti, E., Sarno, M. D., & Pierro, R. D. (2024) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.573 · Cited by 3
Models of Personality Structure
Raad, B. D., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.012 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Processes and Models
Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.028 · Cited by 5
Koļesņikova, J., Perepjolkina, V., Sudraba, V., Mārtinsone, K., & Stepens, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00498 · Cited by 3
“DSM-5 Dimensional Approach to PDs Diagnosis Researchers pointed to the need to revise the diagnostic approach to PDs concerning high rates of comorbidity, the heterogeneity, observed among patients with the same diagnosis, and poor grounding of the cut-off points for differential diagnosis (23, 24).”
BackgroundBasic Needs, Goals and Motivation
Szalma, J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.030 · Cited by 3
Conceptualizing Youth BPD Within an MMPI-A Framework
Sellbom, M., & Jarrett, M. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_6 · Cited by 3
Personality in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Dragūns, J. G., & Tanaka‐Matsumi, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.037 · Cited by 4
General Personality Disorder: A study into the core components of personality pathology
Berghuis, H. (2014) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 3
PART I Theoretical Foundations
(1998) · doi:10.5040/9798216964643.0005 · Cited by 3
Bliton, C. F., Dowgwillo, E. A., Dawood, S., & Pincus, A. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_923 · Cited by 3
Fowler, J. C., Oldham, J. M., Hopwood, C. J., & Thomas, K. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394258970.ch21 · Cited by 3
Lans, L., Huijbregts, K. M. L., Westerhof, G. J., Haeyen, S., Derks, Y. P. M. J., & Noordzij, M. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1591871 · Cited by 2
Schiemainski, P. L. A., Kunz, J. I., Nagl, S., Wolf, J., Goerigk, S. A., Jobst, A., Padberg, F., & Reinhard, M. A. (2025) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.70045 · Cited by 3
Are none, some, or all disorders interpersonal?
Cheli, S. (2025) · RICERCA PSICOANALITICA · doi:10.4081/rp.2025.1095 · Cited by 2
“The original decision was to officially adopt the new dimensional system, which included a general criterion of functioning (consistent with the GAF) and a specific criterion of maladaptive traits (Skodol, 2012).”
Psychopathy, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, and Robert Hare
Widiger, T. A., Crego, C., & Hines, A. (2026) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-026-10281-9 · Cited by 2
“This was explicitly evident in the proposal to change the name of the diagnosis from “antisocial” to “antisocial/psychopathic” (Skodol, 2012).”
Narrative Identity in the Social World
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Haraldsson, K. G., & Lowe, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.035 · Cited by 2
Lynam, D. R., Vize, C. E., & Miller, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.043 · Cited by 2
Jayawickreme, E., & Zachry, C. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.032 · Cited by 2
Classification in Traditional Nosologies
Keeley, J. W., Chung, L., & Kleva, C. S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780197542521.003.0001 · Cited by 2
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Greek Personality Psychopathology Inventory (GPPI-5)
Thomadakis, C., Tsaousis, I., Douzenis, A., & Stogiannidou, A. (2023) · Psychological Test Adaptation and Development · doi:10.1027/2698-1866/a000049 · Cited by 2
Personality and Personality Disorders
Blais, M. A., Rivas-Vazquez, R. A., Ruchensky, J. R., & Stein, M. B. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-11844-9.00037-0 · Cited by 2
From Surface to Depth: Toward a More Psychodynamically InformedDSM-6
Bornstein, R. F. (2015) · Psychoanalytic Inquiry · doi:10.1080/07351690.2015.987592 · Cited by 2
Paris, J. (2014) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000041 · Cited by 3
Personality disorders and suicide
Nelson, K. J., Miller, M. J., Zagoloff, A. D., Schreiner, M. W., & Schulz, S. C. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519502.015 · Cited by 2
Personality and Personality Disorders
Scalabrini, A., Mucci, C., & Northoff, G. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75112-2_18 · Cited by 2
Sellbom, M., & Bromberg, D. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_10 · Cited by 2
Cluster C Anxious-Fearful Personality Pathology and Avoidance
Sanislow, C. A., & Hector, A. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333931.053 · Cited by 2
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.020 · Cited by 4
Psychopathy and Personality Disorders
Crego, C. (2022) · Dangerous behavior in clinical and forensic psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83156-1_12 · Cited by 2
Изучение психометрических характеристик русскоязычной версии опросника PID-5-BF
Kustov, G., Zinchuk, M., Pashnin, E., Voinova, N., Popova, S., Gersamija, A., Яковлев, А. А., Аведисова, А. С., & Гехт, А. Б. (2022) · Психология Журнал Высшей школы экономики · doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2022-3-521-542 · Cited by 3
Widiger, T. A., Tyrer, P. J., McCabe, G. A., & Kim, Y. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42825-9_14-1 · Cited by 2
Woods, W. C., Edershile, E. A., Wright, A. G. C., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (2018) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000302 · Cited by 2
Deconstructing Individual Differences in Long-Term Personality Disorder and Trait Change
Woods, W. C., Wright, A. G. C., Skodol, A. E., Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619865227 · Cited by 2
“…change is much more prominent for pathological traits than diagnostic dimensions may be explained by the relative heterogeneity of presentations within PD diagnostic groups (Skodol, 2012; Widiger & Trull, 2007) and the more homogeneous nature of trait dimensions relative to PD constructs.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationModels of Physical Health and Personality
Heilmayr, D., & Friedman, H. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.019 · Cited by 2
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Roche, M. J., & Pincus, A. L. (2015) · The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp218 · Cited by 2
Personality Disorders: Current Scientific Status and Ongoing ControversiesPreprint
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Latzman, R. D. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2u9wg · Cited by 2
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kjqdu · Cited by 2
DSM-5 PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY TRAITS AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS
Landínez-Martínez, D., Tabares, Á. S. G., & Arredondo, N. H. L. (2021) · Psychologia · doi:10.21500/19002386.5050 · Cited by 2
The Development of the Five-Factor Schizoid Inventory
Meyer, N. A., Hein, K. E., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Mullins‐Sweatt, S. N. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911231209289 · Cited by 1
“…that the DSM -IV/5 PDs are maladaptive variants of the domains and facets of the FFM, all that has become known about the etiology, course, assessment, correlates, and outcome of FFM traits can be applied to the APA PDs, some of which have received very little empirical research (Skodol, 2012).”
InfluentialDuijndam, S., Kidane, R., Lodder, P., & Bachrach, N. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.70084 · Cited by 1
24 textes fondateurs de la psychiatrie
Masson, M. (2013) · Armand Colin eBooks · doi:10.3917/arco.asson.2013.01.0205 · Cited by 1
Sallis, H., Smith, G. D., & Munafo, M. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.024 · Cited by 1
Self-Regulation and Control in Personality Functioning
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.029 · Cited by 1
Dissociative and Psychotic Features
Cavelti, M., Thomson, M., & Kaess, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191964343.003.0013 · Cited by 1
Kotelnikova, Y., Clark, L. A., & Hayden, E. P. (2019) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-019-09729-y · Cited by 1
“They can also be used to describe personality pathology in the context of the alternative model for PDs (AMPD; Clark et al. 2015; Skodol 2012) developed for theDiagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; APA 2013).”
Borroni, S., Scalabrini, A., Masci, E., Mucci, C., Diamond, D., Somma, A., & Fossati, A. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/pra.0000000000000498 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Skodol, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Skodol, Andrew E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-04-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 317-344
- ISSN
- 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-5951
- OpenAlex
- W2124226322
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- personality disorders, DSM-5, diagnostic classification, personality pathology, diagnostic criteria, classification validity, psychiatric diagnosis, personality disorder assessment
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review