The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality Disorders in DSM-5
Abstract
A substantive revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) last occurred in 1994; therefore, the mental health field should anticipate significant changes to the classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition. Since DSM-5 Work Groups have recently proposed revisions for the major diagnostic classes of mental disorders, an article on the current status of the personality disorders (PDs) is timely. This article reviews scientific principles that have influenced the development of proposed changes for the assessment and diagnosis of personality psychopathology in DSM-5, presents the proposed model as of the summer of 2011, summarizes rationales for the changes, and discusses critiques of the model. Scientific principles were articulated for DSM-5 more than a decade ago; their application to the process has not been straightforward, however. Work Group members have labored to improve the DSM-5 approach to personality and PDs to make the classification more valid and more clinically useful. The current model continues to be a work in progress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The chair of the work group said that it was reinstated due, in part, to the comments posted on the official website “bemoaning its deletion as a specific PD” (Skodol 2012, p. 331).”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Skodol 2012
In the citing paper
“Both the DSM-5 (Section III) (1) and the ICD-11 (13) recommend using a hybrid model of diagnosis, which combines the categorical and dimensional models, because this combination has the strongest predictive validity (9, 14).”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 · Cited by 2,792
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Ozer, D. J., & Benet‐Martínez, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · Cited by 2,307
Establishment of Diagnostic Validity in Psychiatric Illness: Its Application to Schizophrenia
ROBINS, E., & GUZE, S. B. (1970) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.126.7.983 · Cited by 2,243
Public health significance of neuroticism
Lahey, B. B. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0015309 · Cited by 1,901
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158668 · Cited by 1,645
The maturing architecture of the brain's default network
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Barch, D. M., Raichle, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800376105 · Cited by 1,314
Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses.
Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4 · Cited by 1,294
Reich, J. W., Zautra, A., & Hall, J. S. (2010) · Cited by 1,291
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Costa PT, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual
- First MB, 1997, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II)
- Livesley WJ, 2000, Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology
- Rounsaville BJ, 2002, A Research Agenda for DSM-V, 1
- Skodol AE, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 381
- Tellegen A, 1994, Personality Measures: Development and Evaluation, 1, 133
- Torgersen S, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 83
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–359 of 359
Personality in Nonhuman Animals
Bell, A. M., & Bensky, M. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.023 · Cited by 1
Weiß, A., & Deary, I. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.005 · Cited by 2
Personality and the Unconscious
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Costantini, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.008 · Cited by 2
Jin, M. J., Lee, H.-J., Hwang, K.-S., Lee, J., Yang, C.-M., Jang, S.-H., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.30773/pi.2021.0164 · Cited by 1
Magnani, B., & Dimaggio, G. (2023) · QUADERNI DI PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA · doi:10.3280/qpc52-2023oa16176 · Cited by 1
Havelka, H. L. (2018) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 1
Genetics of Personality Disorders
South, S. C., & Reichborn‐Kjennerud, T. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0022415.pub2 · Cited by 1
Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.001 · Cited by 1
Addendum: Statistical Analyses and Computer Programming in Personality
Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.045 · Cited by 1
Widiger, T. A., & Gore, W. L. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397045-9.00092-6 · Cited by 1
In search of a better ontology of mental disorder
Köhne, A. C. J. (2022) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/1591 · Cited by 1
The Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Empirical Studies
Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät, I. (2014)
Conclusion: Future of Relational Psychopathology
Hooper, L. M., L’Abate, L., Sweeney, L. G., Gianesini, G., & Jankowski, P. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8081-5_8
Koslow, S. H., Ruiz, P., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519502.012
THE FIVE-FACTOR OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE INVENTORY: AN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ANALYSIS
Presnall-Shvorin, J. (2015) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
Clinical Judgement and the DSM5
Sexton–Radek, K. (2014) · Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000e107
Friedel, R. O. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/pra.0000000000000074
Haggerty, G., Esang, M., Salaheldin, K. A., & Lima, A. (2020) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2512
Personality Assessment Methods
Boyle, G. J., & Helmes, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.011 · Cited by 1
Schermer, J. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.014
Social Relations and Social Support
Austin, E. Q., Knack, J. M., Jensen‐Campbell, L. A., & Rex‐Lear, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.036
Chiesa, M. C., Atti, A. R., Licitra, M., Alberti, S., Epifani, A., Gilmozzi, R., & Pozzi, E. (2020) · PubMed Central · doi:10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200603
Integrative assessment of personality and psychopathology: A validation study with the MMPI-2-RF
van der Heijden, P. T. (2013) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University)
Tackett, J. L., Reardon, K. W., Kaufman, M., & Sherman, R. A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pc9fa
Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.002
Bliton, C. F., Dowgwillo, E. A., Dawood, S., & Pincus, A. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_923-1
Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.046
Bibliography: Personality Disorders
(2013) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.11.2.214
Morality and the Terror of Mortality—The Pyramid of Adaptive Behaviors to the Fear of DeathPreprint
Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4122536
Widiger, T. A., & Hines, A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91497-0.00104-1 · Cited by 1
Fard, Z. G., Menton, W. H., Shakiba, S., Bo, S., Mirabzadeh, A., Pourshahbaz, A., & Pazhooyan, M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05538-5
“In this regard, although a domain of compulsivity which was highly concordant with ICD-11 Anankastia domain had been initially considered by the DSM-5 P&PD Workgroup, it was ultimately removed to achieve the aim of presenting a simplified personality model (Skodol, 2012).”
Narcissistic and dependent traits and behavior in four archetypal 2-person, 2-choice games
Reed, L. I., Cooke, L., Kasaba, I., Harrison, E., & Hooley, J. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1275403
“Furthermore, there is relatively little research on dependent and narcissistic personality disorders relative to other personality disorders across all empirical works (51).”
BackgroundIntegrare e differenziare la personalità e la psicopatologia. Una prospettiva psicodinamica
Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2024) · PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE · doi:10.3280/pu2024-001003
Persönlichkeitsstörungen und HiTOP-Diagnostik
Hopwood, C. J. (2024) · PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog · doi:10.1055/a-2124-0186
Ishfaq, N., & Kamal, A. (2024) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-024-00788-0
“Diagnosis of personality disorders (PD) in DSM IV TR (APA, 2000) has been criticized due to the inadequate coverage of personality psychopathology (Clark, 2007; Skodol, 2012; Verheul et al., 2007; Widiger & Trull, 2007; Widiger et al., 2009).”
Dussault, O., Grondin, S., & Laverdière, O. (2024) · Timing & Time Perception · doi:10.1163/22134468-bja10112
Widiger, T. A., Tyrer, P. J., McCabe, G. A., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51366-5_14
Instruments and Other Sources of Diagnostic Information
Bach, B., & Sellbom, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191964343.003.0006
Price, D. G., Quayle, W. M., & Unruh, B. T. (2025) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-025-01595-8
“Skodol’s proposal on behalf of the DSM-5 Personality Disorders work group [28] was met with disapproval in the American Journal of Psychiatry by “experienced senior clinicians and researchers of diverse backgrounds who have expertise in personality disorders” [29].”
Blow, T., Amar, P., & Chandler, R. (2025) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.cps.2025.03.001
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kjqdu_v1
Alves, M. M., Machado, G. M., & Carvalho, L. D. F. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07980-z
Borderline Personality Disorder Diagnoses in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Large Database Analysis
Lorenz, F. J., Ma, C., Givens, A. K., & Walen, S. G. (2025) · OTO Open · doi:10.1002/oto2.70135
“7,8 It is characterized by signi fi cant instability in moods, behaviors, functioning, and self ‐ image, 9 which is what may frequently lead these patients to facial plastic surgery clinics.”
Network Architectures of Personality and Its Pathology
Köhne, A. C. J., & Isvoranu, A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009445955.015
van Zyl, C. V. (2025) · African Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.175
“…comorbidity among disorders, within-disorder heterogeneity, the use of arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, unsatisfactory reliability and validity and the overuse of the Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified diagnosis (Huprich, 2015; Skodol, 2012; Trull & Durrett, 2005; Widiger & Trull, 2007).”
Gilmartin, T. L., Gurvich, C., & Sharp, G. (2025) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01413-9 · Cited by 1
“There has been a more recent shift towards understanding personality pathology from a dimensional perspective, concordant with current frameworks for understanding normative personality [8, 53, 56].”
Oliveira, A. C. D. A., & Rodriguez-Seijas, C. (2025) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2025.39.5.355
Kiel, L., Balzen, K. M., Cano, K., & Sharp, C. (2025) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2025.2569681 · Cited by 1
“…approach to personality pathology are well-documented (Clark, 2007; Hopwood et al., 2018), prompting a paradigm shift toward dimensional models that reconceptualize personality disorders (PDs) through personality functioning and pathological personality traits (Mulder & Tyrer, 2019; Skodol, 2012).”
Zell, C. S., Balzen, K. M., Boudreaux, J., Penner, F., & Sharp, C. (2025) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-025-00329-9
“In response to concerns regarding the categorical framework for personality disorders, the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) was proposed as a replacement for the Section II model in DSM-5 [1, 2].”
Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., Payant, M., Côté, A., Faucher, J., Lampron, M., & Tremblay, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13889184
Etude des psychoses dissociées : Approche clinique et projective comparées
Prudent, C. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ab4b1fd9zc85ez4b30za640z24076e6e7ba3
Su, C. C.-Y., Bart, T. A., & Cicero, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197769676.003.0026
Affect before diagnosis: applying affective neuroscience to psychiatry
White, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1858824
Ikhtabi, S., Morant, N. J., Rushforth, A., Rowe, S. L., Pearce, E., Dale, O., Pitman, A., & Johnson, S. (2026) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000671
Soziale Bedingungen bei Jugendlichen mit Persönlichkeitsstörungen
Konzett, L., Sevecke, K., & Gander, M. (2026) · PTT - Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Theorie und Therapie · doi:10.21706/ptt-30-3-312
A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Early Detection of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
Kaur, N., & Sıngh, V. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0675-7.ch001
Crombie, T. (2013) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Metadata
- Authors
- Skodol, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Skodol, Andrew E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-04-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 317-344
- ISSN
- 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-5951
- OpenAlex
- W2124226322
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- personality disorders, DSM-5, diagnostic classification, personality pathology, diagnostic criteria, classification validity, psychiatric diagnosis, personality disorder assessment
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review