Cited by 1,163Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About

Athey, Susan, Imbens, Guido W.·2019·Annual Review of Economics

Abstract

We discuss the relevance of the recent machine learning (ML) literature for economics and econometrics. First we discuss the differences in goals, methods, and settings between the ML literature and the traditional econometrics and statistics literatures. Then we discuss some specific methods from the ML literature that we view as important for empirical researchers in economics. These include supervised learning methods for regression and classification, unsupervised learning methods, and matrix completion methods. Finally, we highlight newly developed methods at the intersection of ML and econometrics that typically perform better than either off-the-shelf ML or more traditional econometric methods when applied to particular classes of problems, including causal inference for average treatment effects, optimal policy estimation, and estimation of the counterfactual effect of price changes in consumer choice models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine-learning algorithms are different from traditional statistical modeling as there is no formalization or a priori theorization of relationships between variables.

    “Machine-learning algorithms, then, are different from traditional statistical modeling as there is no formalization or a priori theorization of relationships between variables (Athey and Imbens 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2019-08-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
685-725
ISSN
  • 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1391
OpenAlex
W2922705140
Cited by
1,163
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 295 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 3
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
machine learning, econometrics, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, matrix completion, causal inference, average treatment effect, consumer choice models, price effects, regression analysis, classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review