The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insect Response to Plant Defensive Protease Inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
Plant protease inhibitors (PIs) are natural plant defense proteins that inhibit proteases of invading insect herbivores. However, their anti-insect efficacy is determined not only by their potency toward a vulnerable insect system but also by the response of the insect to such a challenge. Through the long history of coevolution with their host plants, insects have developed sophisticated mechanisms to circumvent antinutritional effects of dietary challenges. Their response takes the form of changes in gene expression and the protein repertoire in cells lining the alimentary tract, the first line of defense. Research in insect digestive proteases has revealed the crucial roles they play in insect adaptation to plant PIs and has brought about a new appreciation of how phytophagous insects employ this group of molecules in both protein digestion and counterdefense. This review provides researchers in related fields an up-to-date summary of recent advances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain
Schechter, I., & Berger, A. (1967) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(67)80055-x · Cited by 5,204
Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes
(2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03628-9 · Cited by 2,616
Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference
Baum, J. A., Bogaert, T., Clinton, W., Heck, G. R., Feldmann, P., Ilagan, O., Johnson, S., Plaetinck, G., Munyikwa, T., Pleau, M., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1359 · Cited by 1,789
Protease Inhibitors in Plants: Genes for Improving Defenses Against Insects and Pathogens
Ryan, C. A. (1990) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.28.090190.002233 · Cited by 1,547
P LANT R ESPONSES TO I NSECT H ERBIVORY: The Emerging Molecular Analysis
Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207 · Cited by 1,482
The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum
Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06784 · Cited by 1,374
Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Wang, J.-W., Hong, G.-J., Tao, X.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Huang, Y.-P., & Chen, X.-Y. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1352 · Cited by 1,358
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor in Plant Leaves: A Possible Defense Mechanism against Insects
Green, T. R., & Ryan, C. A. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.175.4023.776 · Cited by 1,191
The Handbook of proteolytic enzymes
Barrett, A. J., Rawlings, N. D., & Woessner, J. F. (1998) · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Kant, M. R., Jonckheere, W., Knegt, B., Lemos, F., Liu, J., Schimmel, B. C. J., Villarroel, C. A., Ataide, L. M. S., Dermauw, W., Glas, J. J., et al. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv054 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu-Salzman, K., & Zeng, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-01-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 233-252
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2156233383
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect Response to Plant Defensive Protease Inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020816
- The paper
- Zhu-Salzman, K., & Zeng, R. (2015). Insect Response to Plant Defensive Protease Inhibitors. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
