Cited by 148Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Side Streams of Plant Food Processing As a Source of Valuable Compounds: Selected Examples

Open access
Schieber, Andreas·2017·Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Industrial processing of plant-derived raw materials generates enormous amounts of by-products. On one hand, these by-products constitute a serious disposal issue because they often emerge seasonally and are prone to microbial decay. On the other hand, they are an abundant source of valuable compounds, in particular secondary plant metabolites and cell wall materials, which may be recovered and used to functionalize foods and replace synthetic additives with ingredients of natural origin. This review covers 150 references and presents select studies performed between 2001 and 2016 on the recovery, characterization, and application of valuable constituents from grape pomace, apple pomace, potato peels, tomato pomace, carrot pomace, onion peels, by-products of citrus, mango, banana, and pineapple processing, side streams of olive oil production, and cereal by-products. The criteria used were economic importance, amounts generated, relevance of side streams as a source of valuable compounds, and reviews already published. Despite a plethora of studies carried out on the utilization of side streams, relatively few processes have yet found industrial application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-food-030216-030135

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fruits and vegetables are abundant in essential nutrients and contain high levels of water, soluble carbohydrates, fiber, minerals, vitamins, polyphenols, and other bioactive compounds.

    “Fruits and vegetables are abundant in essential nutrients and contain high levels of water, soluble carbohydrates, fiber, minerals, vitamins, polyphenols, and other bioactive compounds [14]”

    From Valorization of Food Waste to Produce Value-Added Products Based on Its Bioactive Compounds (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes phenolic compounds, other bioactive constituents, and dietary fiber in plant-processing by-products. The Tomato, Carrot, and Onion By-products section (page unavailable) also reports sugars and minerals in tomato pomace. These passages support parts of the nutrient list, but they do not establish that fruits and vegetables generally contain high levels of every listed component, particularly water and vitamins. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Various types of food waste, such as waste from fruit, vegetables, grains, and other food production and processing, contain important bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, dietary fiber, proteins, lipids, vitamins, organic acids, and minerals.

    “various types of food waste, such as waste from fruit, vegetables, grains, and other food production and processing, contain important bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, dietary fiber, proteins, lipids, vitamins, organic acids, and minerals”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Mohapatra D, 2010, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 69, 323
  2. Schieber A, 2007, Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants: Phytomedicines, 16, 265
  3. Schieber A, 2009, Food, 3, 23
  4. Stoll T, 2003, Food Agric. Environ., 1, 88

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schieber, A.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schieber, Andreas
Venue
Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
97-112
ISSN
  • 1941-1421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1413
OpenAlex
W2570610801
Cited by
148
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
food by-products, side streams, plant secondary metabolites, cell wall material, grape pomace, apple pomace, potato peel, tomato pomace, carrot pomace, onion peel, citrus by-products, mango by-products, banana by-products, pineapple by-products, olive oil production by-products, cereal by-products, natural additives, functional foods, agricultural waste valorization
MeSH terms
Food Handling, Fruit, Industrial Waste, Refuse Disposal, Vegetables, Food Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review