The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory
Abstract
Deterrence theory and criminal justice policy hold that punishment enhances compliance and deters future criminal activity. Empirical research, however, is decidedly mixed, with some studies finding that punishment weakens compliance, some finding that sanctions have no effect on compliance, and some finding that the effect of sanctions depends on moderating factors. In this review, we do not consider whether sanctions affect compliance but instead consider the conditions under which sanctions affect compliance. Specifically, we focus on understanding the kinds-of-people dimension of sanctions and deterrence to include individual differences (in social bonding, morality, discount rate, impulsivity, social network position, decision-making competence) and situational differences (in emotions, alcohol/drug use). Upon reviewing the empirical evidence, we identify important gaps for theoretical and empirical work and comment on how this work relates to public policy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To investigate the effects of justice system contact on future behavior, it is necessary to account for preexisting individual differences that may cause some individuals to have a higher risk of coming into contact with the justice system in the first place (e.g., see Murray, Farrington, & Eisner, 2009; Nagin & Paternoster, 1993; Piquero, Paternoster, Pogarsky, & Loughran, 2011; Pogarsky, 2002).”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Piquero, Paternoster, Pogarsky, & Loughran, 2011
In the citing paper
“First, we followed the call of previous research (see, e.g., Farrington, 2003; Murray et al., 2009; Piquero et al., 2011; Pogarsky, 2002) and employed one of the most rigorous nonexperimental methodological designs capable of accounting for a wide range of selection effects and confounding influences.”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Piquero et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Theory of games and economic behavior
Garcia, S. R., & Miller, S. J. (2019) · American Mathematical Society eBooks · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,777
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
Becker, G. S. (1968) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259394 · Cited by 13,999
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa066082 · Cited by 5,007
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Crime, Shame and Reintegration
Braithwaite, J. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804618 · Cited by 4,153
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bouffard JA, 2000, Of Crime and Criminality, 159
- 10.1525/sp.1965.13.1.03a00030 · DOI
- Katz J., 1988, Seductions of Crime
- Kennedy DM, 2001, Reducing Gun Violence: The Boston Gun Project's Operation Ceasefire. Developing and Implementing Operation Ceasefire.
- 10.1257/aer.97.1.444 · DOI
- Piquero AR, 2005, Integrated Developmental & Life-Course Theories of Offending: Advances in Criminological Theory, 51
- Pratt TC, 2006, Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory—Advances in Criminological Theory, 15, 367
- Simon HA., 1979, Models of Thought
- 10.1525/sp.1969.16.4.03a00020 · DOI
- Wilson JQ., 2010, Natl. Aff., 2, 105
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–297 of 297
King, T. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05750-8 · Cited by 3
“As such, a person’s own fear of incurring a penalty will inhibit or deter them from engaging in similar unethical behaviors (Piquero et al., 2011; Pratt et al., 2006).”
Effect of police expenditure on crime rate in India
Anthony, B., & Appavu, U. (2024) · Safer Communities · doi:10.1108/sc-02-2024-0003 · Cited by 3
Are Group Settings Intoxicating? Groups, Alcohol, and the Situational Dynamics of Violence
Lantz, B., & Wouters, S. R. (2024) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00938548241307320 · Cited by 3
“However, there is considerable empirical evidence suggesting the important impact of alcohol on the estimation of costs and rewards during crime commission (Piquero et al., 2011; zimring & Hawkins, 1973).”
Assessing the Extent and Sources of NCAA Rule Infractions
Piquero, A. R. (2012) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00849.x · Cited by 3
Self-citationInvestigating the role of deterrence in promoting road rule compliance among young drivers
Truelove, V. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.200323 · Cited by 3
Public Perception and Compliance with Traffic Regulations in Zamboanga City, Philippines
Valerio, A. S. (2024) · Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies · doi:10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i06.015 · Cited by 2
Understanding the Cause and Diversity of Women's Drink and Drug Driving—A Qualitative Exploration
Armstrong, K. A., Watling, H., Mieran, T., & Marigold, J. (2026) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.70141 · Cited by 2
Overview of: “The Differential Short‐Term Impacts of Executions on Felony and Non‐Felony Homicides”
Land, K. C., Teske, R., & Zheng, H. (2012) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00829.x · Cited by 2
Rethinking Police Evaluation Research: Balancing “Zen” with the “Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”
Greene, J. R. (2018) · Justice Evaluation Journal · doi:10.1080/24751979.2018.1478442 · Cited by 2
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2023) · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/10439862231172731 · Cited by 2
Sonde, D. R., Raji, B. A., & Eghuruamrakpo, A. (2024) · NIU journal of humanities. · doi:10.58709/niujhu.v9i1.1824 · Cited by 2
Punishment possibility and implicit morality: The moderating role of moral identity
Liu, C.-J., & Hao, F. (2024) · Journal of Psychology in Africa · doi:10.1080/14330237.2024.2364371 · Cited by 2
“future crimes (Piquero et al., 2011).”
Rosbough, C. P. (2013) · International Journal of Criminology and Sociology · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.45 · Cited by 2
“…Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA; Tel: (850) 644-4050; Fax: (850) 644-9614; E-mail: cpr09@my.fsu.edu domestic violence cases (which arise largely out of the Minnesota Domestic Violence Experiment or MDVE and Spouse Abuse Replication Program or SARP (see Piquero et al. 2011)).”
BackgroundBellair, P. E., Lopez, S. H., LaPlant, E. G., Vuolo, M., & Apel, R. J. (2023) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287221140838 · Cited by 2
“This situation is in some respects analogous to deterrence literature in which some scholars have argued (Piquero et al., 2011) that criminal justice sanctions may reduce criminal involvement among some individuals, while having no effect or possibly increasing criminal behavior among others.”
ResultPolicing Citizens: Minority Policy in Israel
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cited by 2
Comportamento social na adolescência: as normas e a rotina na regulação da conduta delituosa
Alves, F. M. (2016) · doi:10.11606/d.59.2016.tde-11052016-104347 · Cited by 2
How Punishment Affects Crime: An Integrated Understanding of the Behavioral Mechanisms of PunishmentPreprint
van Rooij, B., Kuiper, M. E., & Piquero, A. R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4790878 · Cited by 2
“Scholars have found that (potential) offenders have different levels of deterrability (Jacobs 2010, Pogarsky 2002, Thomas, Loughran, and Piquero 2013, Urban 2009, Bouffard, Exum, and Niebuhr 2018),, and that sanctions may differ for some people under certain conditions (Piquero et al. 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationExamining speeding behaviour: An application of Situational Action Theory
Rose, C. (2024) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.249816 · Cited by 2
Heuristics and Biases in the Criminology of Compliance
Pogarsky, G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108759458.036 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBoccio, C. M. (2025) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2025.2479022 · Cited by 1
“Another possibility may be that some people are more deterrable than others depending on temperamental features (Hirtenlehner 2019; Loughran, Paternoster, and Piquero 2018; Piquero and Tibbetts 1996; Piquero et al. 2011).”
Piquero, A. R. (2025) · Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology · doi:10.1007/s40865-025-00272-x · Cited by 1
“Criminologists have started to pay more attention to how individual differences may manifest differentially across different types of situations (Piquero et al., 2011).”
Self-citationReducing Crime on London Buses: A Randomised Controlled Trial on Moving Hotspots
Hubbard-Chason, T., Ariel, B., Assaraf, N., & Harinam, V. (2025) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10986111251392931 · Cited by 1
“Central to this calculus is the perceived probability of ap-prehension, supplemented — though typically to a lesser extent — by considerations of the severity and immediacy of potential sanctions (Nagin, 2013; Piquero et al., 2011; Pratt et al., 2017).”
The Morality of Speeding and the Conditional Relevance of Controls
Rose, C., & Hardie, B. (2026) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00202-3 · Cited by 1
Wippell, J. G. R., Haynie, D. L., & Riedman, D. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119049 · Cited by 1
Ye, X., & Robert, L. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3757279.3788657 · Cited by 1
“This approach stands in contrast to traditional deterrence models, which posit that compliance arises from fear of punishment or negative consequences [27, 83].”
Love, S., & Truelove, V. (2026) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2026.03.002 · Cited by 1
Psychological Contributions to Competition Law Compliance
Paruzel, A., Steinmann, B., Nübold, A., Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44633-2_11 · Cited by 1
Examining Regulatory Pragmatism along the India-Nepal Border
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Mills, L., Freeman, J., & Truelove, V. (2024) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00938548241240064 · Cited by 1
“This finding reflects the concept of “differential deterrence” which refers to the dynamic, changing nature of sanctions and assumes that there are individual, social, emotional, and situational factors influencing one’s sanction response (Piquero et al., 2011).”
InfluentialDeterrability and Moral Judgment
Infante, A. A., & Fine, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108759458.020 · Cited by 1
A study of drink driving in Lagos – from the perspective of law enforcement officers
Ogeleyinbo, C. (2015) · Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) · Cited by 1
King, T., & Farrar, J. M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3826736 · Cited by 1
Integrating Rational Choice and Other Theories
Tibbetts, S. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_400 · Cited by 1
Breaking the chain: How arrests reduce the probability of near repeat crimesPreprint
Wheeler, A. P., Riddell, J. R., & Haberman, C. P. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/7tazd · Cited by 2
Perceptions of Sanctions and Their Effects
Yasrebi, F. (2025) · doi:10.5463/thesis.1036 · Cited by 1
Effects of Football on Stock Markets: Return-Volatility RelationshipPreprint
Berument, H., & Ceylan, N. B. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2020971
Mendoza, J. (2014) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Niggli, M. A., & Maeder, S. (2014) · Asian Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11417-014-9185-7 · Cited by 1
An analysis of decision making and criminal outcomes in sexual offenders
Pedneault, A. (2015) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Kabia, V. S. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Talk and deterrence in drug markets
Dickinson, T. (2015) · IRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis)
Fitting-in: How Formerly Incarcerated New York City Black Men Define Success Post-Prison
DeVeaux, M. (2017) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.18997.68323
Edwards, K. M., & Bennett, S. A. (2017) · Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance · doi:10.1080/23303131.2017.1340917
“…(e.g., the race and economic status of the victim) and may result in unintended consequences for the victim (e.g., arrest of the victim) and because punitive responses may not be particularly effective in reducing recidivism (Goodmark, 2004, 2013; Piquero et al., 2011; Sherman et al., 1992).”
BackgroundDissuasion conditionnelle, programme d’accès graduel à la conduite et infractions routières
Poirier, B., Blais, É., & Faubert, C. (2017) · Criminologie · doi:10.7202/1041706ar
“…de la dissuasion classique, la théorie de la dissuasion conditionnelle soutient que l’effet de la menace et de l’imposition de sanctions varie en fonction des types d’infraction, des contextes et des caractéristiques des individus (Andenaes, 1974 ; Geerken et Gove, 1975 ; Piquero et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialYao, J. (2019) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1665442
“Recent studies on deterrence have also suggested the role of differential deterrence; i.e., the effect of sanctions is not uniform across persons (Piquero et al. 2011; Loughran et al. 2012).”
BackgroundIntroduction: Policing Citizens
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.001
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.003
The Skin Color Effect: Police and the Jews of Ethiopian Descent
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.005
Arab Citizens: National Minority and Police
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.004
The Religious Factor: Ultra-Orthodox Jews (Haredim)
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.006
Criminalidad homicida, capitalismo y democracia
Albarello, J. G. G., & Corzo, J. (2021) · Análisis Político · doi:10.15446/anpol.v34n102.99932
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.002
Integration and Citizenship: Russian Immigrants
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.007
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.009
Ben‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.008
Loughran, T. A. (2013) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0167
Self-citationBen‐Porat, G., & Yuval, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108265164.010
Assessing deterrence in the FBI's Safe Streets gang initiative
Sharpe, W. A. (2022) · doi:10.17760/d20439242
Forest Canopy Density Analysis
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.005.0003
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.002.0004
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.005.0002
From James to Regulatory Pragmatism
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0002
Inconsistent State Action, Inaccurate Legal Knowledge, and Non-Compliance
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0005
Compliance in the Absence of Significant Coercive Capacity
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0004
Putting Regulatory Pragmatism into Practice
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0008
Accurate Legal Knowledge under Adverse Conditions
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0006
Regulatory Pragmatism outside of the Forest
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0007
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.003.0001
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.005.0001
Ostermann, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197661116.002.0007
Overconfidence and Public Intoxication Arrest: Evidence from a University Town Police Log
Hoffman, E. N., & Kim, Y. (2022) · The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy · doi:10.1515/bejeap-2022-0060
The Role of Morality in Individuals’ Willingness to Offend Within a Rational Choice Perspective
Burckley, J., Jaynes, C. M., Santos, M. R., & Cochran, J. K. (2024) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2024.2314097
“…types of individuals are not influenced by threats of formal sanctioning is now recognized and broadly referred to as “differential deterrence” (Jacobs, 2010; Loughran et al., 2012; Paternoster & Simpson, 1996; Piquero et al., 2011; Svensson et al., 2013; Thomas & McCuddy, 2019; Walters, 2020).”
Focusing on When Do People Obey Laws and Why It Matters
Roy, S. (2024) · International law and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53055-5_1
Zhang, J., Sun, C., Liao, B.-W., Hu, M., & Chen, W. L. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4232000/v1
Outcomes Associated with Arrest for Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Connor, R. A., Johnson, L., Bridgeman, M., Shokraneh, F., & Hakobyan, B. (2024) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241284777 · Cited by 2
“This finding aligns with multiple reports in our review that found that the effects of arrest depend on various factors, as well as the conclusion that arrest likely deters some offenders some of the time 13 (Piquero et al., 2011; Sherman, 1992).”
van Veen, F., Sattler, S., & Mehlkop, G. (2024) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2024.2432355
“…the contrary, frequent users who may have habitualized their consumption are assumed to develop relatively stable risk perceptions and, therefore, may be less responsive to new information about risk (Grevenstein et al. 2015; cf. Piquero et al. 2011 for examples of risk updating in other domains).”
How does the MDB cross-debarment system curb corruption? — From the perspective of deterrence theory
Zhang, H. (2025) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-025-10204-x
“This rational framework has been extensively studied, with researchers examining the deterrence effect of punitive actions in preventing unethical and illegal behavior (Pratt et al., 2008; Kennedy, 2008; Piquero et al., 2011; Auriol & Søreide, 2017).”
Vanhee, A. J. (2025) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2
“In order to see if incarceration can truly deter at least some individuals, scholars have examined specific subpopulations of offenders (Piquero et al., 2011; Rydberg & Clark, 2016).”
InfluentialMorality, context, and crime decision-making
Herman, S. (2023) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/ry46-seks
Bouffard, J. A., & Sitren, A. H. (2025) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287251348173
“…examined here also seemed to be potentially useful bivariate correlates (consistent with some of the existing deterrence research reviewed by A. Piquero et al., 2011), however in examining the path model results, it appeared that only one’s level of family attachment was consistently related…”
Testing an Expanded Model of Deterrence Applied to Guilty Plea Decision Making
Wilson, T., Yan, S., Kijowski, M. C., & Forston, J. W. (2025) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2025.2527112
“The former group has often tested deterrence or individual differences determining offending (e.g., self-control, peers, etc., Piquero et al., 2011).”
The Social Psychology of Crime and Deviance
Clay‐Warner, J., & Warner, A. E. (2025) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93138-3_18
Yang, B., Lu, W., Chen, J., Yuan, L., & Bao, Z. (2025) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115137
Lokanan, M. (2025) · Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime · doi:10.1177/2631309x251362852
“Deterrence theory posits that the threat of punishment deters individuals from engaging in undesirable behaviors (Natarajan, 2016; Piquero et al., 2011; Rorie & West, 2022).”
Macías-Vasileff, V., Bogaerts, S., Caluwé, E. D., Erbaş, Y., & Garofalo, C. (2025) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00224278251394278
“The concept of differential deterrability captures this variability, positing that responsiveness to legal threats varies according to individuals ’ personal and situational characteristics (Piquero et al. 2011).”
Tiongson, P. J. D., & Jernigan, D. H. (2025) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2025.2589985
“30,31 This CAP serves two functions.”
Lee, W. M. W., & Lu, W. (2025) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2025.106427
Recency and decay effects in sanction risk updating
Thomas, K. J., & Pogarsky, G. (2026) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.70044
Self-citationÖztürk, Ş. (2026) · Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.58820/eruhfd.1878208
Aging Behind Bars: The Growth of the Older Incarcerated Adult Population and Emerging Penal Reform
Shin, H., & You, M. (2026) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws15030035
“…extended the basic deterrence model and highlighted its extensive role, including the rationality of individuals’ perceptions of punishment, the role of informal sanctions, and the functions of punishment in both formal and informal social controls (Grasmick and Bursik 1990; Piquero et al. 2011).”
Association between healthcare violence legislation and emergency department violence in Türkiye
Sutaşır, M. N., Tarakçıoğlu, Z. E., Mohamed, M. M., Arslan, B., Tatlı, M., & Hökenek, N. M. (2026) · Discover Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12982-026-02429-5
Punishment and Compliance: A Conjoint Experiment Based on Red Light Running Behaviors
Ni, X., & Luye, Z. H. A. O. (2026) · China Public Administration Review · doi:10.26599/cpar.2026.9680206
Lee, J., & Lee, I. (2026) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287261492670
Inkpen, C. S., Tueller, S., & Lattimore, P. K. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-026-09772-2
Configuring hidden and visible camera enforcement for risky driving deterrence
Truelove, V., Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó., & Larue, G. S. (2026) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2026.108839
Metadata
- Authors
- Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 335-360
- ISSN
- 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-3631
- OpenAlex
- W2032247959
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- deterrence theory, individual differences, punishment, sanctions, compliance, social bonding, morality, discount rate, impulsivity, social network position, decision-making capacity, emotions, alcohol and drug use, situational factors, criminal justice policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
