Cited by 751Marine Plankton and BiogeochemistryGeological formations and processesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Fate of Terrestrial Organic Carbon in the Marine Environment

Blair, Neal E., Aller, Robert C.·2012·Annual Review of Marine Science

Abstract

Understanding the fate of terrestrial organic carbon (C org ) delivered to oceans by rivers is critical for constraining models of biogeochemical cycling and Earth surface evolution. C org fate is dependent on both intrinsic characteristics (molecular structure, matrix) and the environmental conditions to which fluvial C org is subjected. Three distinct patterns are evident on continental margins supplied by rivers: (a) high-energy, mobile muds with enhanced oxygen exposure and efficient metabolite exchange have very low preservation of both terrestrial and marine C org (e.g., Amazon subaqueous delta); (b) low-energy facies with extreme accumulation have high C org preservation (e.g., Ganges-Brahmaputra); and (c) small, mountainous river systems that sustain average accumulation rates but deliver a large fraction of low-reactivity, fossil C org in episodic events have the highest preservation efficiencies. The global patterns of terrestrial C org preservation reflect broadly different roles for passive and active margin systems in the sedimentary C org cycle.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142717

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Graf G, 1992, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 30, 149
  2. Keil RG, 1997, Proc. Ocean Drill. Program, Sci. Results, 155, 531
  3. Paul EA, 1978, Trans. 11th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 3, 61
  4. Raghukumar C, 2008, Fungal Divers., 31, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blair, N. E., & Aller, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Marine Science
Published
2012-01-15
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
401-423
ISSN
  • 1941-0611 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1405
OpenAlex
W2125501690
Cited by
751
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
terrestrial organic carbon, organic carbon preservation, continental margin, subaqueous delta, Ganges-Brahmaputra delta, biogeochemical cycles, organic matter reactivity
MeSH terms
Carbon, Environment, Oceans and Seas, Geologic Sediments, Carbon Cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review