Cited by 350Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution

COPSE reloaded: An improved model of biogeochemical cycling over Phanerozoic time

Open access
Lenton, Timothy M., Daines, Stuart J., Mills, Benjamin J.W.·2018·Earth-Science Reviews

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.004

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A first-order relationship between global marine new production, global extent of anoxia, and atmospheric pO2 has been obtained from Earth system ocean-atmosphere models.

    “The first-order relationship between global marine new production (newp′), global extent of anoxia (AANOX) and atmospheric pO2 (o′) has been obtained from Earth system ocean–atmosphere models (57):”
  • The constants kanox = 12 and ku = 0.5 were determined so that 0.25% of the seafloor is overlain by anoxic water masses at modern productivity and oxygen levels, and the formula gives a fairly sharp transition of AANOX from 23 to 77% as atmospheric pO2 declines from 13 to 8 atm%, consistent with biogeochemical models.

    “The constants kanox = 12, ku = 0.5 are determined so that 0.25% of the seafloor is overlain by anoxic water masses similar to modern productivity and oxygen levels (newp′ = o′ = 1) and the formula gives a fairly sharp transition of AANOX from 23 to 77% as atmospheric pO2 declines from 13 to 8 atm%, consistent with biogeochemical models for the spatial distribution of oxygen in the oceans (57, 58).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [12]12. Belcher, C.M. and McElwain, J.C., 2008. Limits for Combustion in Low O2 Redefine Paleoatmospheric Predictions for the Mesozoic. Science, 321(5893): 1197-1200.
  2. [17]17. Berner, R.A., 1991. A model for atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time. American Journal of Science, 291: 339-376.
  3. [45]45. Engebretson, D.C., Kelley, K.P., Cashman, H.J. and Richards, M.A., 1992. 180 Million Years of Subduction. GSA Today, 2(5): 93-100.
  4. [74]74. IPCC (Editor), 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.
  5. [75]75. Johnson, J.E., Gerpheide, A., Lamb, M.P. and Fischer, W.W., 2014. O2 constraints from Paleoproterozoic detrital pyrite and uraninite. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 126(5- 6): 813-830.
  6. [94]94. McArthur, J.M., Howarth, R.J. and Shields, G.A., 2012. Chapter 7 -Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy, The Geologic Time Scale. Elsevier, Boston, pp. 127-144.
  7. [120]120. Schaller, M.F., Wright, J.D. and Kent, D.V., 2011. Atmospheric Pco2 Perturbations Associated with the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province. Science, 331(6023): 1404-1409.
  8. [133]133. Veizer, J. and Mackenzie, F.T., 2003. Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks, Treatise on Geochemistry: Sediments, Diagenesis and Sedimentary Rocks. Elsevier, pp. 369-407.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenton, T. M., Daines, S. J., & Mills, B. J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Lenton, Timothy M.
Venue
Earth-Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
178
Pages
1-28
ISSN
0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772093563
Cited by
350
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 10
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth-Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Leeds
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P013651/1, NE/N018508/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Keywords
atmospheric oxygen, atmospheric CO2, sulfate, strontium isotopes, ocean anoxia, seafloor weathering, volcanic rock weathering, land plants, carbon cycle modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review