Cited by 97Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Southern Hemisphere Wind Changes on the Meridional Overturning Circulation in Ocean Models

Open access
Gent, Peter R.·2016·Annual Review of Marine Science

Abstract

Observations show that the Southern Hemisphere zonal wind stress maximum has increased significantly over the past 30 years. Eddy-resolving ocean models show that the resulting increase in the Southern Ocean mean flow meridional overturning circulation (MOC) is partially compensated by an increase in the eddy MOC. This effect can be reproduced in the non-eddy-resolving ocean component of a climate model, providing the eddy parameterization coefficient is variable and not a constant. If the coefficient is a constant, then the Southern Ocean mean MOC change is balanced by an unrealistically large change in the Atlantic Ocean MOC. Southern Ocean eddy compensation means that Southern Hemisphere winds cannot be the dominant mechanism driving midlatitude North Atlantic MOC variability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033929

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

3 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Munday DR, 2013, J. Clim., 43, 507
  2. 10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<3212:TDDC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  3. 10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<0567:POQEIP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 97

Metadata

Authors
Gent, P. R.
Affiliations
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Gent, Peter R.
Venue
Annual Review of Marine Science
Published
2016-01-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
79-94
ISSN
  • 1941-0611 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1405
OpenAlex
W2097783866
Cited by
97
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
meridional overturning circulation, eddy parameterization, eddy-resolving ocean model, Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, wind-driven circulation
MeSH terms
Atlantic Ocean, Climate, Models, Theoretical, Seawater, Water Movements, Wind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review