The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial Neglect and Attention Networks
Open accessAbstract
Unilateral spatial neglect is a common neurological syndrome following predominantly right hemisphere injuries and is characterized by both spatial and non-spatial deficits. Core spatial deficits involve mechanisms for saliency coding, spatial attention, and short-term memory and occur in conjunction with nonspatial deficits that involve reorienting, target detection, and arousal/vigilance. We argue that neglect is better explained by the dysfunction of distributed cortical networks for the control of attention than by structural damage of specific brain regions. Ventral lesions in right parietal, temporal, and frontal cortex that cause neglect directly impair nonspatial functions partly mediated by a ventral frontoparietal attention network. Structural damage in ventral cortex also induces physiological abnormalities of task-evoked activity and functional connectivity in a dorsal frontoparietal network that controls spatial attention. The anatomy and right hemisphere dominance of neglect follow from the anatomy and laterality of the ventral regions that interact with the dorsal attention network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The dorsal and ventral attention networks have been shown to co-activate during reorienting of visuospatial attention (Corbetta and Shulman 2011), and the ventral frontal cortical regions, including the PMV, may mediate the interaction between the systems (Vossel et al. 2014).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Corbetta and Shulman 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Self-citationThe attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
Self-citationShifts in Selective Visual Attention: Towards the Underlying Neural Circuitry
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3833-5_5 · Cited by 3,762
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 · Cited by 3,197
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Bizzi, E. (2000) · Cited by 2,547
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498 · cited 2×
“Perhaps the most widely accepted, standard theory of neglect postulates that the right hemisphere controls shifts of attention to both sides of space. while the left hemisphere only controls attention to the right side (Mesulam 1981).”
Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention
Posner, M., Walker, J., Friedrich, F., & Rafal, R. (1984) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01863.1984 · Cited by 2,191
Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems
Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604187103 · Cited by 2,101
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1037//0096-3445.128.4.450 · DOI
- Heilman KM, 1987, The Handbook of Physiology. Section 1: The Nervous System. Volume V. Higher Functions of the Brain Part 2, 461
- Koch C, 1985, Hum. Neurobiol., 4, 219
- O'Keefe J., 2006, The Hippocampus Book, 475
- Thimm M, 2008, Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 26, 481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 · Cited by 1,656
Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems: Distinct Neural Circuits but Collaborative Roles
Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2014) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858413494269 · Cited by 1,438
Controllability of structural brain networks
Gu, S., Pasqualetti, F., Cieslak, M., Telesford, Q. K., Yu, A. B., Kahn, A. E., Medaglia, J. D., Vettel, J. M., Miller, M. B., Grafton, S. T., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9414 · Cited by 912
Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: What is magic and what is not
Pourtois, G., Schettino, A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007 · Cited by 687
Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks
Uddin, L. Q., Yeo, B. T. T., & Spreng, R. N. (2019) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6 · Cited by 683
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2011-07-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 569-599
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- PMC
- PMC3790661
- OpenAlex
- W2141447814
- Cited by
- 1,318
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Johns Hopkins University
- University of Oregon
- University College London
- Université de Genève
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 71920-06, R01MH071920)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061117)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- hemispatial neglect, right hemisphere dominance, attentional networks, dorsal attention network, spatial attention, short-term memory, sustained attention, functional connectivity, right parietal cortex, right temporal cortex, right frontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Humans, Functional Laterality, Neural Pathways, Perceptual Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
