Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Imaging in Pathology: Whole-Slide Imaging and Beyond

Ghaznavi, Farzad, Evans, Andrew, Madabhushi, Anant, Feldman, Michael·2013·Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease
DOI 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-120902
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Digital imaging in pathology has undergone an exponential period of growth and expansion catalyzed by changes in imaging hardware and gains in computational processing. Today, digitization of entire glass slides at near the optical resolution limits of light can occur in 60 s. Whole slides can be imaged in fluorescence or by use of multispectral imaging systems. Computational algorithms have been developed for cytometric analysis of cells and proteins in subcellular locations by use of multiplexed antibody staining protocols. Digital imaging is unlocking the potential to integrate primary image features into high-dimensional genomic assays by moving microscopic analysis into the digital age. This review highlights the emerging field of digital pathology and explores the methods and analytic approaches being developed for the application and use of these methods in clinical care and research settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-120902

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 116

  1. 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4103/2153-3539.68332 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/1472-6890-6-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181cfb788 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/jcp.2008.057737 · doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.057737
  6. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181822057 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.12.005 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/modpathol.2009.190 · DOI
  10. 10.4103/2153-3539.74940 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.08.026 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1402-1 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1402-1
  13. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.010 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hedvat CV, 2010, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 134, 1666, 10.5858/2009-0579-RAR1.1 · DOI
  15. 16. Thorstenson S. 2009. From the conventional microscope to the digital slide scanner in routine diagnostic histopathology . Presented at Pathol. Vis. Conf., San Diego
  16. 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e11 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.024 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Stratman C, 2009, Digital pathology in the clinical histology lab: a time and motion study.
  19. 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.006 · DOI
  20. 10.4103/2153-3539.73320 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00758.x · DOI
  22. 10.1309/QAM22Y85QCV5JM47 · DOI
  23. 10.4103/2153-3539.91129 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/1746-1596-1-40 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.12.004 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.011 · DOI
  27. 10.1155/2012/726526 · DOI
  28. 10.4103/2153-3539.84232 · DOI
  29. 10.4103/2153-3539.77170 · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.77170
  30. 10.1155/2011/769680 · doi:10.1155/2011/769680
  31. Jukic DM, 2011, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 135, 372, 10.5858/2009-0678-OA.1 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00493.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.prp.2011.03.005 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.08.007 · DOI
  35. 10.1186/1746-1596-3-S1-S6 · DOI
  36. Fallon MA, 2010, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 134, 1020, 10.5858/2009-0320-OA.1 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.05.015 · DOI
  38. Ramey JP, 2011, Mod. Pathol., 24, 436
  39. Ramey JP, 2011, Mod. Pathol., 24, 341
  40. Reyes C, 2011, Mod. Pathol., 24, 454
  41. Ho J, 2009, Validating digital slides for clinical use: When is image quality good enough?
  42. 10.4103/2153-3539.68327 · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.68327
  43. 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.07.001 · DOI
  44. Wilbur DC, 2009, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 133, 1949, 10.5858/133.12.1949 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Bloom K, 2009, The virtual consultative network
  46. 10.1093/jnci/djn200 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djn200
  47. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.005 · DOI
  48. Raab SS, 2005, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 129, 459, 10.5858/2005-129-459-PSIAPM · DOI
  49. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815a04f5 · DOI
  50. 10.1309/AJCPPIA5D7MYKDWF · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s00405-011-1526-x · doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1526-x
  52. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.008 · DOI
  53. 10.4103/2153-3539.82052 · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.82052
  54. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.009 · DOI
  55. 10.1186/1746-1596-5-73 · DOI
  56. 10.4103/2153-3539.63822 · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.63822
  57. Marchevsky AM, 2006, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 130, 349, 10.5858/2006-130-349-TUOVMF · doi:10.5858/2006-130-349-tuovmf
  58. 10.1002/cncr.22766 · doi:10.1002/cncr.22766
  59. 10.1155/2012/103857 · doi:10.1155/2012/103857
  60. 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S23 · doi:10.1186/1746-1596-6-s1-s23
  61. 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.01.008 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.09.008 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/ase.262 · DOI
  64. Farah CS, 2009, J. Dent. Educ., 73, 942, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.8.tb04783.x · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.8.tb04783.x
  65. 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.020 · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.020
  66. 10.1136/jcp.2004.018739 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/labinvest.3700357 · doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700357
  68. 10.1002/cncr.20302 · doi:10.1002/cncr.20302
  69. 10.1002/cncr.23252 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/cyto.a.20292 · DOI
  71. 10.1093/ilar.49.1.78 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/cyto.a.20319 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1117/1.2032458 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03878.x · DOI
  75. 10.1309/KRNFWQQEUPLQL76L · doi:10.1309/krnfwqqeuplql76l
  76. 10.4161/cbt.5.8.3261 · DOI
  77. Keshava N, 2003, Lincoln Lab. J., 14, 55
  78. 10.1109/TIP.2010.2079810 · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2079810
  79. 10.1007/978-1-60327-811-9_12 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-811-9_12
  80. 10.1007/978-1-60761-806-5_15 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-806-5_15
  81. 10.1093/annonc/mdn369 · DOI
  82. 10.1038/modpathol.3801021 · DOI
  83. 10.2325/jbcs.978 · doi:10.2325/jbcs.978
  84. 10.1038/nm791 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_6 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_6
  86. 10.1586/14737159.8.6.707 · DOI
  87. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02513.x · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0097 · DOI
  89. 10.4137/CIN.S911 · doi:10.4137/cin.s911
  90. 10.1155/2003/548678 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00071-7 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 98. Boucheron LE, Harvey NR, Manjunath BS. 2008. On using cytoplasm and stroma features in automated cancer diagnosis . Presented at Workshop Bio-Image Inform. Biol. Imaging, Comput. Vis. Data Min., Santa Barbara
  94. 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl407 · DOI
  96. 10.1101/gr.190001 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1109/34.574797 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Jolliffe IT, 2002, Principal Component Analysis
  99. 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2031559 · DOI
  100. 10.1109/TVCG.2009.119 · DOI
  101. 10.1109/TNN.2008.2005582 · DOI
  102. 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.911536 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.56 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260189 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.260189
  105. 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.250598 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Madabhushi A, 2005, Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 8, 729
  107. 10.1016/0010-4825(93)90090-N · doi:10.1016/0010-4825(93)90090-n
  108. 10.1016/0020-7101(91)90029-E · doi:10.1016/0020-7101(91)90029-e
  109. 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90023-I · doi:10.1016/0010-4825(90)90023-i
  110. 115. Doyle S, Hwang M, Shah K, Madabhushi A, Tomaszeweski J, Feldman M. 2007. Automated grading of prostate cancer using architectural and textural image features. Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging , pp. 1284–87 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Rajpoot K, 2004, Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2, 829
  112. Doyle S, 2006, Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 9, 504
  113. 10.1109/TBME.2003.812194 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1109/TMI.2007.898536 · DOI · Paper page
  115. 10.1515/cclm.2010.193 · DOI
  116. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002564 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Ghaznavi, F., Evans, A., Madabhushi, A., & Feldman, M.
Venue
Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
331-359
ISSN
  • 1553-4006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-4014
DOI
10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-120902
OpenAlex
W2111574404
Cited by
459
References
2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Imaging in Pathology: Whole-Slide Imaging and Beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-120902
The paper
Ghaznavi, F., Evans, A., Madabhushi, A., & Feldman, M. (2013). Digital Imaging in Pathology: Whole-Slide Imaging and Beyond. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-120902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.