Cited by 816Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in EducationSocial Media in Health Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobile Text Messaging for Health: A Systematic Review of Reviews

Open access
Hall, Amanda K., Cole-Lewis, Heather, Bernhardt, Jay M.·2015·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to identify mobile text-messaging interventions designed for health improvement and behavior change and to derive recommendations for practice. We have compiled and reviewed existing systematic research reviews and meta-analyses to organize and summarize the text-messaging intervention evidence base, identify best-practice recommendations based on findings from multiple reviews, and explore implications for future research. Our review found that the majority of published text-messaging interventions were effective when addressing diabetes self-management, weight loss, physical activity, smoking cessation, and medication adherence for antiretroviral therapy. However, we found limited evidence across the population of studies and reviews to inform recommended intervention characteristics. Although strong evidence supports the value of integrating text-messaging interventions into public health practice, additional research is needed to establish longer-term intervention effects, identify recommended intervention characteristics, and explore issues of cost-effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. AHRQ (Agency Healthc. Res. Qual.), 2014, Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.
  2. de Jongh T, 2012, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 12, 12
  3. Garrard J, 2010, Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy
  4. Horvath T, 2012, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 3, CD009756
  5. Int. Telecommun. Union, 1985, Telecommun. J., 52, 67
  6. Int. Telecommun. Union, 2014, The World in 2014: ICT Facts and Figures.
  7. Mukund Bahadur K-C, 2010, Stud. Health Technol. Inform., 160, 530
  8. Shaw R, 2014, Diabetes Technol. Ther., 16, S59
  9. Vodopivec-Jamsek V, 2012, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 12, CD007457
  10. Whittaker R, 2012, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 11, CD006611

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 816

Metadata

Authors
Hall, A. K., Cole-Lewis, H., & Bernhardt, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2015-03-18
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
393-415
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2118907952
Cited by
815
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 17
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington (T15LM007442)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007079, T15LM007442)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
text messaging, health behavior change, diabetes self-management, weight loss, physical activity, smoking cessation, medication adherence, antiretroviral therapy, public health interventions, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Program Evaluation, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review