The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Big Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy
Open accessAbstract
The digital world is generating data at a staggering and still increasing rate. While these "big data" have unlocked novel opportunities to understand public health, they hold still greater potential for research and practice. This review explores several key issues that have arisen around big data. First, we propose a taxonomy of sources of big data to clarify terminology and identify threads common across some subtypes of big data. Next, we consider common public health research and practice uses for big data, including surveillance, hypothesis-generating research, and causal inference, while exploring the role that machine learning may play in each use. We then consider the ethical implications of the big data revolution with particular emphasis on maintaining appropriate care for privacy in a world in which technology is rapidly changing social norms regarding the need for (and even the meaning of) privacy. Finally, we make suggestions regarding structuring teams and training to succeed in working with big data in research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model”
From Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., & Burgess, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv080 · Cited by 9,816
Wing, J. M. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215 · Cited by 8,102
Sontrop, J. M., Dixon, S. N., Garg, A. X., Jiménez, I. B., Dohein, O., Huang, S. S., & Clark, W. F. (2013) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000350377 · Cited by 5,903
Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626958 · Cited by 5,722
A survey on feature selection methods
Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 · Cited by 5,189
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890) · University of Washington Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780295803661-014 · Cited by 4,092
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Aramaki E, 2011, Proc. Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process., Edinburgh, 1568
- De Choudhury M, 2013, Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (ICWSM), 7th, Boston, 128
- Hernán MA, 2010, Causal Inference
- Ivanov O, 2002, Proc. AMIA Symp., 2002, 345
- Jain S, 2016, Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NIPS), 29th, 2693
- Jain S, 2017, Proc. AAAI, 31st, San Francisco, 2066
- Kwan M-P, 2016, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 106, 274
- 89. Menon A, Rooyen BV, Ong CS, Williamson B. 2015. Learning from corrupted binary labels via class-probability estimation. Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML-15), 32nd, Lille, France , pp. 125–34
- Natarajan N, 2013, Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NIPS), 26th, 1196
- Nguyen MN, 2011, Proc. Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), 22nd, Barcelona, 1421
- Ola O, 2014, Online J. Public Health Inform., 5, 223
- Tan M, 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1371
- Thomson JJ, 1975, Philos. Public Aff., 4, 295
- 10.2307/1321160 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress
Goetz, L. H., & Schork, N. J. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.006 · Cited by 976
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9 · Cited by 507
“Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model [27, 28].”
BackgroundWang, M., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Wan, C., Pan, L., Pan, S., He, K., Neo, A., & Chen, X. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003014 · Cited by 451
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.
Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra, N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8 · Cited by 435
Iyamu, I., Gómez-Ramírez, O., Xu, A. X., Chang, H.-J., Watt, S., Mckee, G., & Gilbert, M. (2022) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076221102255 · Cited by 118
“These technologies were said to sometimes draw false associations and conclusions, perpetuate stigma, and widen health disparities.(28,36,113,114)”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mooney, S. J., & Pejaver, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Public Health
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2018-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-112
- ISSN
- 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2093
- PMC
- PMC6394411
- OpenAlex
- W2781122472
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington Research Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (2t32hd057822-16)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32, HD057822)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- big data, public health, machine learning, privacy, surveillance (medicine), hypothesis generation, causal inference, big data ethics, data science education, research groups
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Big Data, Confidentiality, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Population Surveillance, Public Health, Research, Causality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
