Cited by 118Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPublic Health Policies and EducationHealthcare Systems and Practices

Challenges in the development of digital public health interventions and mapped solutions: Findings from a scoping review

Open access
Iyamu, Ihoghosa, Gómez-Ramírez, Oralia, Xu, Alice XT, Chang, Hsiu-Ju, Watt, Sarah, Mckee, Geoff, Gilbert, Mark·2022·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Background: “Digital public health” has emerged from an interest in integrating digital technologies into public health. However, significant challenges which limit the scale and extent of this digital integration in various public health domains have been described. We summarized the literature about these challenges and identified strategies to overcome them. Methods: We adopted Arksey and O’Malley's framework (2005) integrating adaptations by Levac et al. (2010). OVID Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and 14 government and intergovernmental agency websites were searched using terms related to “digital” and “public health.” We included conceptual and explicit descriptions of digital technologies in public health published in English between 2000 and June 2020. We excluded primary research articles about digital health interventions. Data were extracted using a codebook created using the European Public Health Association's conceptual framework for digital public health. Results and analysis: Overall, 163 publications were included from 6953 retrieved articles with the majority (64%, n = 105) published between 2015 and June 2020. Nontechnical challenges to digital integration in public health concerned ethics, policy and governance, health equity, resource gaps, and quality of evidence. Technical challenges included fragmented and unsustainable systems, lack of clear standards, unreliability of available data, infrastructure gaps, and workforce capacity gaps. Identified strategies included securing political commitment, intersectoral collaboration, economic investments, standardized ethical, legal, and regulatory frameworks, adaptive research and evaluation, health workforce capacity building, and transparent communication and public engagement. Conclusion: Developing and implementing digital public health interventions requires efforts that leverage identified strategies to overcome diverse challenges encountered in integrating digital technologies in public health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076221102255

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [15]Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software, www.covidence.org.
  2. [95]Heldman MPH AB Schindelar MPH J Weaver III, et al. Social media engagement and public health communication: implications for public health organizations being truly “social”. Public Health Rev 2013; 35: 1– 18.
  3. [111]Canadian Institutes for Health Research. AI For public health equity: workshop report. Toronto, Ontario, https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51425.html (2019).
  4. [115]Kostkova P. A roadmap to integrated digital public health surveillance. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ‘13 Companion. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, pp. 687– 694.
  5. [146]Rachadell JJ Brinzac M-G. Digital health in 2019. A summary report of the track of digital health at the 12th European Public Health conference 2019 in Marseille, France. Marseille, https://eupha.org/repository/conference/2019/Digital_Health_in_2019_V2.pdf (2020).
  6. [161]European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies & Hamilton, Clayton. Charting the future of digital health systems in the WHO European Region. Eurohealth 2019; 25(2): 3–6 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332520 (accessed 21 July 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iyamu, I., Gómez-Ramírez, O., Xu, A. X., Chang, H.-J., Watt, S., Mckee, G., & Gilbert, M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
  • British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Mark
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2022-01
Volume
8
Pages
205520762211022
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282924562
Cited by
118
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Population and Public Health at the British Columbia Center for Disease Control
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
digital public health, digital health interventions, implementation barriers, health equity, health policy, data infrastructure, workforce capacity, intersectoral collaboration, political commitment, citizen participation, digital integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review