CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

Expanding Notions of LGBTQ+

Open access
Russell, Stephen T., Bishop, Meg D., Fish, Jessica N.·2023·Annual Review of Sociology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-032256PMC PMC11709134
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Sexual identity labels and meanings have been expanding. We explore how sexual identities are taking shape, intertwining, and emerging in new forms among a growing number of LGBTQ+ people (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning, or people whose identities are outside the historically privileged or dominant groups of heterosexual sexual identities). We situate contemporary sexual identities in theories of the social construction of identity, intersectionality, and the life course. We review recent research that illuminates identity complexity and intersectionality, the increasingly intertwined understandings and experiences of sexuality and gender, and intersections of sexuality and gender with identities embedded in race and social class. Finally, we consider new work that situates sexual identities in the context of life course development, including life stage, developmental processes, and relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-032256

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conservative Christian communities and organizations are implicated in the large increase in anti-LGBTQ legislation.

    “Meanwhile, conservative Christian communities and organizations are implicated in the large increase in anti-LGBTQ legislation (Russell, Bishop, and Fish 2023)”

    From Coming Out Queer: Sexual and Romantic Exploration and Identity Development of LGBQ+ College Students (2025) · cites this paper as Russell, Bishop, and Fish 2023

    The Life Course section (page unavailable) describes a “deluge of anti-trans policies,” supporting the claim that anti-LGBTQ legislation has increased. It does not implicate conservative Christian communities or organizations in that increase. The discussion of Christian identity in Identity Complexities and Intersectionality (page unavailable) does not link those communities to legislation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Abelson M. 2019. Men in Place: Trans Masculinity, Race, and Sexuality in America. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  2. Aguayo-Romero R. 2021. (Re)centering Black feminism into intersectionality research. Am. J. Public Health 111(1): 101– 3 33326278 PMC7750622
  3. Austin M. 2016. Geisha of a different kind: race and sexuality in Gaysian America. Queer Stud. Media Pop Cult 1(1): 111– 15
  4. Barrow K, Kuvalanka K. 2011. To be Jewish and lesbian: an exploration of religion, sexual identity, and familial relationships. J. GLBT Fam. Stud 7(5): 470– 92
  5. Barsigian L, Hammack P, Morrow Q, Wilson B, Russell S. 2020. Narratives of gender, sexuality, and community in three generations of genderqueer sexual minorities. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers 7(3): 276– 92 32984432 PMC7511091
  6. Bates A, Hobman T, Bell B. 2020. “Let me do what I please with it… Don’t decide my identity for me”: LGBTQ+ youth experiences of social media in narrative identity development. J. Adolesc. Res 35(1): 51– 83
  7. Bauer G, Churchill S, Mahendran M, Walwyn C, Lizotte D, Villa-Rueda A. 2021. Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM Popul. Health 14: 100798 33997247 PMC8095182
  8. Bauer G, Scheim A. 2019. Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities. Soc. Sci. Med 226: 236– 45 30674435
  9. Berger M. 2022. Coining intersectional stigma: historical erasures and the future. Am. J. Public Health 112(Suppl. 4): 338– 39 PMC9241461 35763750
  10. Bishop M, Fish J, Hammack P, Russell S. 2020. Sexual identity development milestones in three generations of sexual minority people: a national probability sample. Dev. Psychol 56(11): 2177– 93 32833471 PMC8216084 Documents timing and pacing of sexual identity developmental milestones in a national US sample.
  11. Blosnich J, Henderson E, Coulter R, Goldbach J, Meyer I. 2020. Sexual orientation change efforts, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide ideation and attempt among sexual minority adults, United States, 2016–2018. Am.J. Public Health 110(7): 1024– 30 PMC7287530 32437277
  12. Bowleg L. 2021. Evolving intersectionality within public health: from analysis to action. Am. J. Public Health 111(1): 88– 90 33326269 PMC7750585
  13. Bowleg L, Bauer G. 2016. Invited reflection: quantifying intersectionality. Psychol. Women Q 40(3): 337– 41
  14. Carpenter L. 2010. Gendered sexuality over the life course: a conceptual framework. Sociol. Perspect 53(2): 155– 77
  15. Carrier L, Dame J, Lane J. 2020. Two-spirit identity and indigenous conceptualization of gender and sexuality: implications for nursing practice. Creative Nurs. 26(2): 96– 100 32321791
  16. Cass V. 1979. Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model. J. Homosex 4(3): 219– 35 264126
  17. Copulsky D, Hammack P. 2021. Asexuality, graysexuality, and demisexuality: distinctions in desire, behavior, and identity. J. Sex Res 60(2): 221– 30 34919461
  18. Craig S, McInroy L. 2014. You can form a part of yourself online: the influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. J. Gay Lesbian Ment. Health 18(1): 95– 109
  19. Davis J. 2019. Refusing (mis)recognition: navigating multiple marginalization in the U.S. two spirit movement. Rev. Int. Am. Stud 12(1): 65– 86
  20. Eguchi S. 2020. Gaysian fabulosity: quare(ing) the normal and ordinary. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Communication, ed. Goins MN, McAlister JF, Alexander BK, pp. 45– 58. London: Routledge
  21. Eisenberg M, Gower A, Watson R, Rider G, Thomas D, Russell S. 2022. Substance use behaviors among LGBTQ+ youth of color: identification of the populations bearing the greatest burden in three large samples. J. Adolesc. Health 71(3): 317– 23 35715349 PMC9644400
  22. Else-Quest N, Hyde J. 2016a. Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychol. Women Q 40(2): 155– 70
  23. Else-Quest N, Hyde J. 2016b. Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: II. Methods and techniques. Psychol. Women Q 40(3): 319– 36
  24. Fish J. 2020. Future directions in understanding and addressing mental health among LGBTQ youth. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol 49(6): 943– 56 33074740 PMC7736182
  25. Galupo M, Ramirez J, Pulice-Farrow L. 2017. “Regardless of their gender”: descriptions of sexual identity among bisexual, pansexual, and queer identified individuals. J. Bisexuality 17(1): 108– 24
  26. Ghavami N, Katsiaficas D, Rogers L. 2016. Toward an intersectional approach in developmental science: the role of race, gender, sexual orientation, and immigrant status. In Equity and Justice in Developmental Science: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. Horn SS, Ruck MD, Liben LS, pp. 31– 73. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. Vol. 50. New York: Academic 26956069
  27. Goldberg S, Rothblum E, Russell S, Meyer I. 2020. Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: demographic characteristic and sexuality of queer people in a U.S. representative sample of sexual minorities. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers 7(1): 101– 12 34017899 PMC8132578 Demographic investigation of queer and genderqueer identities in a national US sample.
  28. Gorman B, Denney J, Dowdy H, Medeiros R. 2015. A new piece of the puzzle: sexual orientation, gender, and physical health status. Demography 52(4): 1357– 82 26126883
  29. Green A, Price-Feeney M, Dorison S, Pick C. 2020. Self-reported conversion efforts and suicidality among US LGBTQ youths and young adults, 2018. Am. J. Public Health 110: 1221– 27 32552019 PMC7349447
  30. Hammack P. 2015. Theoretical foundations of identity. In The Oxford Handbook of Identity Development, ed. McLean KC, Syed M, pp. 11– 30. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press Presents a cross-disciplinary synthesis of theoretical conceptualizations of identity.
  31. Hammack P, Frost D, Hughes S. 2019. Queer intimacies: a new paradigm for the study of relationship diversity. J. Sex Res 56(4/5): 556– 92 30362833
  32. Hammack P, Frost D, Meyer I, Pletta D. 2018. Gay men’s health and identity: social change and the life course. Arch. Sex. Behav 47(1): 59– 74 28585157 PMC5903851
  33. Hammack P, Hughes S, Atwood J, Cohen E, Clark R. 2022. Gender and sexual identity in adolescence: a mixed-methods study of labeling in diverse community settings. J. Adolesc. Res 37(2): 167– 220
  34. Han C, Proctor K, Choi K. 2014. We pretend like sexuality doesn’t exist: managing homophobia in Gaysian America. J. Men’s Stud 22(1): 53– 63
  35. Henderson N. 2018. ‘Top, bottom, versatile’: narratives of sexual practices in gay relationships in the Cape Metropole, South Africa. Cult. Health Sex 20(11): 1145– 56 28704135
  36. Jacob J. 2015. Conversion therapy ineffective and inappropriate for LGBTQ youth. JAMA 314(20): 2121
  37. Joyner K, Manning W, Bogle R. 2017. Gender and the stability of same-sex and different-sex relationships among young adults. Demography 54(6): 2351– 74 29164498
  38. Katz-Wise S. 2015. Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychol. Sex 6(2): 189– 208
  39. Lassiter J. 2015. Reconciling sexual orientation and Christianity: Black same-gender loving men’s experiences. Ment. Health Relig. Cult 18(5): 342– 53
  40. Lewis M. 2017. A genuine article: intersectionality, Black lesbian gender expression, and the feminist pedagogical project. J. Lesbian Stud 21(4): 420– 31 27633710
  41. Link B, Phelan J. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu. Rev. Sociol 27: 363– 85 Influential review article on conceptualizing stigma.
  42. Mallory A, Russell S. 2021. Intersections of racial discrimination and LGB victimization for mental health: a prospective study of sexual minority youth of color. J. Youth Adolesc 50(7): 1353– 68 33991275 PMC8256387
  43. Martos A, Nezhad S, Meyer I. 2015. Variations in sexual identity milestones among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 12(1): 24– 33 PMC5042327 27695579
  44. Mead GH. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  45. Mernitz S, Perez J, Frost D, Russell S. 2022. Relationship identities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: an exploratory study. Couple Fam. Psychol. Res. Pract 11(2): 89– 101 PMC9451025 36089940
  46. Moore M. 2012. Intersectionality and the study of Black, sexual minority women. Gend. Soc 26(1): 33– 39
  47. Moradi B, Grzanka P. 2017. Using intersectionality responsibly: toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. J. Couns. Psychol 64(5): 500– 13 29048196
  48. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med. 2022. Measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Rep., Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med., Washington, DC 35286054
  49. Oswald R, Blume L, Marks S. 2005. Decentering heteronormativity: a model for family studies. In Sourcebook of Family Theory and Research, ed. Bengston VL, Acock AC, Allen KR, Dilworth-Anderson P, Klein DM, pp. 143– 54. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
  50. Oswald R, Kuvalanka K, Blume L, Berkowitz D, Lloyd S, Few A. 2009. Queering “the family.” In Handbook of Feminist Family Studies, ed. Lloyd SA, Few AL, Allen KR, pp. 43– 55. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
  51. Parent M, Johnson K, Russell S, Gobble T. 2020. Homophobic bullying and suicidal behavior among US heterosexual youth. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 59(2): 205– 8.e1 31493473 PMC10372783
  52. Parks C. 2001. African-American same-gender-loving youths and families in urban schools. J. Gay Lesbian Soc. Serv 13(3): 41– 56
  53. Puckett J, Tornello S, Mustanski B, Newcomb M. 2022. Gender variations, generational effects, and mental health of transgender people in relation to timing and status of gender identity milestones. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers 9(2): 165– 78 35983565 PMC9380989
  54. Robinson M. 2020. Two-spirit identity in a time of gender fluidity. J. Homosex 67(12): 1675– 90 31125297
  55. Roy K, Settersten R. 2023. Family life course theory in the new millennium: perspectives on interdependence and inequality. In Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies, ed. Adamsons K, Few-Demo A, Proulx C, Roy K, pp. 287– 308. New York: Springer
  56. Russell S, Clarke T, Clary J. 2009. Are teens “post-gay”? Contemporary adolescents’ sexual identity labels. J. Youth Adolesc 38(7): 884– 90 19636733
  57. Russell S, Fish J. 2019. Sexual minority youth, social change, and health: a developmental collision. Res. Hum. Dev 16(1): 5– 20 31602178 PMC6786797 Proposes a “developmental collision” between sociohistorical changes for sexual identity development and typical adolescence.
  58. Savin-Williams R. 2009. The New Gay Teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  59. Savin-Williams R. 2017. Mostly Straight: Sexual Fluidity Among Men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  60. Settersten R, Gannon L. 2005. Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Life Course. Oxford, UK: Elsevier
  61. Sheppard M, Mayo J. 2013. The social construction of gender and sexuality: learning from two spirit traditions. Soc. Stud 104(6): 259– 70
  62. Solazzo A, Austin S, Rosario M, Corliss H, Charlton B. 2020. Maternal comfort with lesbian, gay, and bisexual people and their children’s drinking, smoking, and disordered weight control behaviors as adults. LGBT Health 7(7): 375– 84 32877268 PMC7578189
  63. Toomey R, Huynh V, Jones S, Lee S, Revels-Macalinao M. 2017. Sexual minority youth of color: a content analysis and critical review of the literature. J. Gay Lesbian Ment. Health 21(1): 3– 31 28367257 PMC5370177
  64. Troiden R. 1989. The formation of homosexual identities. J. Homosex 17(1/2): 43– 74 2668403
  65. Truong N, Perez-Brumer A, Burton M, Gipson J, Hickson D. 2016. What is in a label? Multiple meanings of ‘MSM’ among same-gender-loving Black men in Mississippi. Glob. Public Health 11(7/8): 937– 52 26950431 PMC5020906
  66. Watson R, Wheldon C, Puhl R. 2020. Evidence of diverse identities in a large national sample of sexual and gender minority adolescents. J. Res. Adolesc 30(Suppl. 2): 431– 42 30758906 Documents 26 distinct adolescent sexual/gender identities that vary by race/ethnicity.
  67. Wegesin D, Meyer-Bahlburg H. 2000. Top/bottom self-label, anal sex practices, HIV risk and gender role identity in gay men in New York City. J. Psychol. Hum. Sex 12(3): 43– 62
  68. Williams T, Connolly J, Pepler D, Craig W. 2003. Questioning and sexual minority adolescents: high school experiences of bullying, sexual harassment and physical abuse. Can. J. Community Ment. Health 22(2): 47– 58 15868837
  69. Wilson B. 2009. Black lesbian gender and sexual culture: celebration and resistance. Cult. Health Sex 11(3): 297– 313 19296308

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, S. T., Bishop, M. D., & Fish, J. N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Russell, Stephen T.
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2023-07-31
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
281-296
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
DOI
10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-032256
PMC
PMC11709134
OpenAlex
W4362474362
Cited by
68
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Texas at Austin (P2CHD042849)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48DP006382, P2CHD041041)
  • Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland (P2CHD041041)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F32AA030194)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48 DP006382)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD042849, P2CHD041041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexual identity labels, social construction of identity, intersectionality, identity complexity, gender and sexuality, race and class, life course development, queer identity, transgender identity, bisexual identity, life stages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review