Cited by 34LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Sexuality, and EducationGender and Feminist Studies

The paradox of progress for sexual and gender diverse youth

Open access
Fish, Jessica N., Russell, Stephen T.·2022·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

In this essay, we explore diversity in sexual and gender identities, with a focus on implications of the current politicized moment for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or questioning youth. As youth come out at younger ages, their personal identity development collides with the adolescence period characterized by peer influence, stigma, and possible victimization. We consider the changing and diverse experiences of coming out in adolescence for sexual and gender diverse youth. The current social and political moment offers possibilities for new identities, yet anti-LGBTQ + legislative and policy actions have crucial implications for health and wellbeing for youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101498

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This leads to a "developmental collision" wherein younger sexual minorities can be exposed to minority stress at young ages when they may be more vulnerable to its negative effects on health and well-being than were their older peers when they were exposed to similar stressors.

    “This leads to a “developmental collision” [55] wherein younger sexual minorities can be exposed to minority stress at young ages when they may be more vulnerable to its negative effects on health and well-being than were their older peers when they were exposed to similar stressors.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fish, J. N., & Russell, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Russell, Stephen T.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
48
Pages
101498
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307216113
Cited by
34
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • NIH (P2CHD041041, P2CHD042849)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48DP006382)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
LGBTQ youth, coming out, adolescence, identity construction, anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, stigma, victimization, peer influence, health and well-being, politicization
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Social Stigma, Policy, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review