The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marriage and Family in East Asia: Continuity and Change
Open accessAbstract
Trends toward later and less marriage and childbearing have been even more pronounced in East Asia than in the West. At the same time, many other features of East Asian families have changed very little. We review recent research on trends in a wide range of family behaviors in China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. We also draw upon a range of theoretical frameworks to argue that trends in marriage and fertility reflect tension between rapid social and economic changes and limited change in family expectations and obligations. We discuss how this tension may be contributing to growing socioeconomic differences in patterns of family formation. This focus on East Asia extends research on the second demographic transition in the West by describing how rapid decline in marriage and fertility rates can occur in the absence of major changes in family attitudes or rising individualism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
East Asian Childbearing Patterns and Policy Developments
Frejka, T., Jones, G. W., & Sardon, J. (2010) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00347.x · Cited by 226 · cited 4×
“Related studies include those by Atoh et al. (2004), Chen & Li (2014), McDonald (2009), Suzuki (2013), Tsuya & Bumpass (2004), and Westley et al. (2010), as well as several papers by Jones and colleagues (e.g., Frejka et al. 2010, Jones & Yeung 2014) that focus primarily on patterns of marriage.”
BackgroundInfluentialChina’s Revolutions and Intergenerational Relations
(2003) · doi:10.3998/mpub.19840 · Cited by 193
6. Filial Obligations in Chinese Families: Paradoxes of Modernization
Whyte, M. K. (2004) · Filial Piety · doi:10.1515/9780804767163-009 · Cited by 185
Explanations of Low Fertility in East Asia: A Comparative Perspective
(2008) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · doi:10.4324/9780203890066-10 · Cited by 36
Cited by
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1 · Cited by 3,666
Babies, Work, or Both? Highly Educated Women’s Employment and Fertility in East Asia
Brinton, M. C., & Oh, E. (2019) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/704369 · Cited by 220
Ultra-low fertility in East Asia: policy responses and challenges
Jones, G. W. (2019) · Asian Population Studies · doi:10.1080/17441730.2019.1594656 · Cited by 198
Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan
Kan, M.-Y., & Hertog, E. (2017) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2017.36.18 · Cited by 99
Jin, Y., Chen, J., & Yu, B. (2019) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.029 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Raymo, J. M., Park, H., Xie, Y., & Yeung, W.-J. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-08-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 471-492
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2096898042
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
