Cited by 186Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Race, Place, and Effective Policing

Braga, Anthony A., Brunson, Rod K., Drakulich, Kevin M.·2019·Annual Review of Sociology

Abstract

The police need public support and cooperation to be effective in controlling crime and holding offenders accountable. In many disadvantaged communities of color, poor relationships between the police and residents undermine effective policing. Weak police–minority community relationships are rooted in a long history of discriminatory practices and contemporary proactive policing strategies that are overly aggressive and associated with racial disparities. There are no simple solutions to address the complex rift between the police and the minority communities that they serve. The available evidence suggests that there are policies and practices that could improve police–minority community relations and enhance police effectiveness. Police departments should conduct more sophisticated analysis of crime problems to ensure that crime-control programs are not indiscriminate and unfocused, engage residents in their crime reduction efforts by revitalizing community policing, ensure procedurally just police contacts with citizens, and implement problem-solving strategies to prevent crimes beyond surveillance and enforcement actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022541

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research reveals no racial or ethnic differences in actual offense rates for all types of crime, with the exception of serious violent crime.

    “Overall, research reveals no racial or ethnic differences in actual offense rates for all types of crime, with the exception of serious violent crime”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Braga et al., 2019

  • Common benchmarks for assessing racial and ethnic disparities in policing do not account for systemic racism in other sectors that contribute to racially and ethnically disproportionate involvement in criminal legal systems.

    “Moreover, these benchmarks do not account for systemic racism in other sectors that contribute to racially and ethnically disproportionate involvement in criminal legal systems (e.g., segregation into areas of concentrated disadvantage that are targeted by hot spots policing; Braga et al., 2019).”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Braga et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braga, A. A., Brunson, R. K., & Drakulich, K. M.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
2019-07-30
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
535-555
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
OpenAlex
W2932209410
Cited by
186
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
20.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
police-community relations, racial disparities in policing, community policing, crime control, procedural justice, proactive policing, police aggression, minority groups, crime prevention, problem-solving policing, public support for policing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review