The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refugees and Exile: From "Refugee Studies" to the National Order of Things
Abstract
This review offers a critical mappingo f the construction-in-progress of refugees and displacement as an anthropological domain of knowledge. It situates the emergence of “the refugee” and of “refugee studies” in two ways: first, historically, by looking at the management of displacement in Europe in the wake of World War II; and second, by tracing an array of different discursive and institutional domains within which “the refugee” and/or “being in exile” have been constituted. These domains include international law, international studies, documentary production by the United Nations and other international refugee agencies, development studies, and literary studies. The last part of the review briefly discusses recent work on displacement, diaspora, and deterritorialization in the context of studies of cultural identity, nationalism, transnational cultural forms—work that helps to conceptualize the anthropological study of displacement in new ways.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Esta historización no solo es profundamente eurocéntrica, sino también Estado-céntrica, ya que se narra a través de tratados y organizaciones internacionales y constituciones nacionales (Malkki 1995, 496).”
From Huida, cimarronaje y santuario: genealogías críticas para deseurocentrar la historia del refugio en el Atlántico Negro (2022) · cites this paper as Malkki 1995, 496
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life
De Genova, N. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432 · Cited by 3,505
Barnett, M. (2005) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592705050401 · Cited by 370
Self-Sovereignty for Refugees? The Contested Horizons of Digital Identity
Cheesman, M. (2022) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836 · Cited by 109
Social work with asylum seekers in Canada: The case for social justice
Lacroix, M. (2006) · International Social Work · doi:10.1177/0020872806059399 · Cited by 36
Raithelhuber, E. (2021) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2019.1606787 · Cited by 32
Furuta, M., & Mori, R. (2008) · Health Care For Women International · doi:10.1080/07399330802269600 · Cited by 26
Karimi, A. (2020) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12316 · Cited by 13
Picozza, F. (2022) · Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.1344/sn2022.26.36875 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Malkki, L. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, California 92717
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 495-523
- ISSN
- 0084-6570
- 1545-4290
- Cited by
- 1,277
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review