Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE AFRICAN DIASPORA

Orser, C. E.·1998·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Archaeologists currently studying the African diaspora generally examine three broad issues, in decreasing order of prominence: the material identification of African identity, the archaeology of freedom at maroon sites, and race and racism. While conducting this research, several scholars have learned that many nonarchaeologists are deeply interested in their interpretations. At the present time, the archaeology of the African diaspora is not a truly global pursuit and the New World is overrepresented. This situation should change as archaeologists around the world discover post-Columbian archaeology and take up diasporic investigations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.63

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The institution of slavery was front and center in much of the early archaeological scholarship on African America.

    “In fact, the institution of slavery was front and center in much of the early archaeological scholarship on African America, as researchers considered living conditions, roles, and power, as well as the new cultural forms that were engendered in that crucible.”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Orser 1998

  • It became increasingly common for researchers to discuss the significance of archaeological research for contemporary society.

    “It also became increasingly common for researchers to discuss the significance of archaeological research for contemporary society (Orser 1998).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Orser 1998

  • Attention to institutions is not entirely new in African American archaeology.

    “The previous reviews showed that attention to institutions is not entirely new.”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Orser 1998

  • Several decades after the first systematic explorations of plantation slavery, a shift toward the concept of diaspora acknowledged the growing number of archaeological studies beyond North America and beyond slavery.

    “As indicated by Orser (1998), several decades after the first systematic explorations of plantation slavery, a shift toward the concept of diaspora acknowledged the growing number of archaeological studies beyond North America and beyond slavery.”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Orser 1998

  • The language of diaspora signaled continued attention to the African roots of American identities and cultures.

    “The language of diaspora also signaled continued attention to the African roots of American identities and cultures.”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Orser 1998

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. Agorsah EK, 1990, Archaeol. Jam., 2, 14
  2. 10.1007/BF01118147 · DOI
  3. Allen SJ. 1995.Africanisms, mosaics, and creativity: the historical archaeology of Palmares. MA thesis. Brown Univ., Providence, RI
  4. 10.1017/S0022216X00023889 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF03373493 · DOI
  6. Belgrave R. 1990.Black people and museums: the Caribbean heritage project in Southampton.InThe Politics of the Past, ed. P Gathercole, D Lowenthal, pp. 63–73. London: Unwin Hyman
  7. Biolsi T, 1997, Indians and Anthropologists: Vine Deloria, Jr. and the Critique of Anthropology., 10.2307/j.ctv1jf2d9c · DOI
  8. Blakey ML. 1990.American nationality and ethnicity in the depicted past.InThe Politics of the Past, ed. P Gathercole, D Lowenthal, pp. 38–48. London: Unwin Hyman
  9. 10.1007/BF03373492 · DOI
  10. Bullen AK, 1945, Bull. Mass. Archaeol. Soc., 6, 17
  11. 10.1007/BF03373581 · DOI
  12. Chambers DB. 1996.“He is an African but speaks plain”: historical creolization in eighteenth-century Virginia.InThe African Diaspora, ed. A Jalloh, SE Maizlish, pp. 100–33. College Station: Texas A&M Univ. Press
  13. Curtin PD, 1990, The Rise and Fall of the Plantation Complex: Essays in Atlantic History.
  14. Deagan K, 1995, Fort Mose: Colonial America's Black Fortress of Freedom.
  15. Deetz J, 1977, In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life.
  16. Díaz-Andreu M. 1996. Islamic archaeology and the origin of the Spanish nation. SeeDíaz-Andreu & Champion 1996, pp. 68–89
  17. Díaz-Andreu M, 1996, Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe.
  18. Emerson MC. 1988.Decorated clay tobacco pipes from the Chesapeake. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  19. Emerson MC. 1994.Decorated clay tobacco pipes from the Chesapeake: an African connection.InHistorical Archaeology of the Chesapeake, ed. PA Shackel, BJ Little, pp. 35–49. Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
  20. 10.1007/BF03373494 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Epperson TW. 1990b.“To fix a perpetual brand”: the social construction of race in Virginia, 1675–1750. PhD thesis. Temple Univ., Philadelphia
  22. Fairbanks CH, 1974, Conf. Hist. Site Archaeol. Pap., 7, 62
  23. Fairbanks CH, 1983, Geosci. Man, 23, 17
  24. 10.1007/BF03374036 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/BF03373562 · DOI
  26. Ferguson L, 1978, Conf. Hist. Site Archaeol. Pap., 12, 68
  27. Ferguson L. 1991.Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina.InThe Archaeology of Inequality, ed. RH McGuire, R Paynter, pp. 28–39. Oxford: Blackwell
  28. Ferguson L, 1992, Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800.
  29. 10.1007/BF03373588 · DOI
  30. Franklin M. 1995. Rethinking the Carter's Grove slave quarter reconstruction: a proposal. InThe Written and the Wrought: Complementary Sources in Historical Archaeology, ed. ME D'Agostino, E Prine, E Casella, M Winer, pp. 147–64.Kroeber Anthropol. Soc. Pap. 79. Berkeley, CA: Kroeber Anthropol. Soc.
  31. Franklin M. 1996.The material expressions of Black American protective symbolism in art and archaeology. Presented at Mus. Early South. Dec. Arts Conf., Winston-Salem, NC
  32. Funari PPA, 1995, Hist. Archaeol. Lat. Am., 7, 1, 10.1093/alh/7.1.1 · DOI
  33. Funari PPA. 1995b.A cultura material de Palmares: o estudo das relações sociais de um quilombo pela arqueologia.InIdéieas: A Luta Contra o Racismo na Rede Escolar, pp. 37–42. São Paulo, Brazil: Fundação Desenvolv. Educação
  34. Funari PPA, 1995, Revista USP, 28, 6
  35. Funari PPA. 1996a.A arqueologia de Palmares: sua contribuição para o conhecimento da história da cultura Afro-Americana.InLiberdade por um Fio: História dos Quilombos no Brasil, ed. JJ Reis, FdS Gomes, pp. 26–51. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Leitras
  36. Funari PPA. 1996b.Novas perspectivas abertas pela arqueologia na Serra da Barriga.InNegras Imagens, ed. LM Schwarcz, LVdS Reis, pp. 139–230. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Univ. de São Paulo
  37. García Arévalo MA, 1986, Cimarron,, 33
  38. 10.1007/BF03374191 · DOI
  39. Gilroy P, 1993, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness.
  40. Guimarães CM, 1990, Estud. Ibero-Am., 16, 161, 10.15448/1980-864X.1990.1-2.36325 · DOI
  41. Guimarães CM, 1980, Pesquisas, 31, 146
  42. Handler JS. 1983.An African pipe from a slave cemetery in Barbados, West Indies.InThe Archaeology of the Clay Tobacco Pipe, Vol. VIII. America, ed. P Davey, pp. 245–54. Oxford: BAR
  43. 10.1007/BF03374222 · DOI
  44. 10.1023/A:1027355822317 · DOI
  45. 10.4159/harvard.9780674332362 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Harrington SPM, 1993, Archaeology, 46, 28
  47. Harris JE. 1996. The dynamics of the global African diaspora. SeeJalloh & Maizlish 1996, pp. 7–21
  48. Harris JE, 1993, Global Dimensions of the African Diaspora.
  49. Hubert J, 1988, World Archaeol. Bull., 2, 12
  50. Jalloh A, 1996, The African Diaspora.
  51. 10.1007/BF03374216 · DOI
  52. Joyner C, 1984, Down by the Riverside: A South Carolina Slave Community.
  53. 10.1017/S0021853700005582 · DOI
  54. Kohl PL, 1995, Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology.
  55. 10.2307/2162952 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/BF03374233 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Lemelle SJ, Kelley RDG. 1994.Imagining Home: Class, Culture, and Nationalism in the African Diaspora, ed. SJ Lemelle, RDG Kelley, pp. 1–16. London: Verso
  58. Leone MP, Mullins PR, Creveling MC, Hurst L, Jackson-Nash B, et al. 1995.Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice?InInterpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, ed. I Hodder, M Shanks, A Alexandri, V Buchli, J Carman, et al, pp. 110–24. London: Routledge
  59. 10.1007/BF02229422 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1023/A:1027359923226 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/BF03374224 · DOI
  62. McKee L, 1994, Northeast Hist. Archaeol., 23, 1
  63. Mintz SW, 1976, An Anthropological Approach to the Afro-American Past: A Caribbean Perspective.
  64. Muller NL. 1994.The house of the black Burghardts: an investigation of race, gender, and class at the W. E. B. DuBois boyhood homesite.InThose of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, ed. EM Scott, pp. 81–94. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press · DOI
  65. Mullins PR. 1996.The contradiction of consumption: an archaeology of African America and consumer culture, 1850–1930. PhD thesis. Univ. Mass., Amherst
  66. Nichols E. 1988.No Easy Run to Freedom: Maroons in the Great Dismal Swamp of North Carolina and Virginia, 1677–1850. MA thesis. Univ. S.C., Columbia
  67. Orser CE, 1984, Southeast. Archaeol., 3, 1
  68. 10.2307/281116 · DOI
  69. Orser CE. 1990.Archaeological approaches to New World plantation slavery.InArchaeological Method and Theory, ed. MB Schiffer, 2:111–54. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
  70. Orser CE, 1992, In Search of Zumbi: Preliminary Archaeological Research at the Serra da Barriga, State of Alagoas, Brazil.
  71. Orser CE, 1993, In Search of Zumbi: The 1993 Season.
  72. 10.1017/S0959774300000950 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/BF03374178 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/978-1-4757-8988-1 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.661 · DOI
  76. Orser CE, 1986, J. Field Archaeol., 13, 342
  77. Orser CE, 1995, Historical Archaeology.
  78. Otto JS. 1980. Race and class on antebellum plantations. SeeSchuyler 1980, pp. 3–13
  79. 10.1002/ajpa.1330740207 · DOI
  80. Palmié S. 1995.Introduction.InSlave Cultures and the Cultures of Slavery, ed. S. Palmié, pp. ix-xlvii. Knoxville: Univ. Tenn. Press
  81. Paynter R. 1990.Afro-Americans in the Massachusetts historical landscape.InThe Politics of the Past, ed. P Gathercole, D Lowenthal, pp. 49–62. London: Unwin Hyman
  82. 10.1007/BF03374153 · DOI
  83. Potter PB, 1994, Public Archaeology in Annapolis: A Critical Approach to History in Maryland's Ancient City.
  84. 10.2307/530180 · DOI
  85. Praetzellis AC. 1991.The archaeology of a Victorian city: Sacramento. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  86. Praetzellis AC, Praetzellis M, Brown M. 1987.Artifacts as symbols of identity: an example from Sacramento's gold rush era Chinese community.InLiving in Cities: Current Research in Urban Archaeology, ed. E Staski, pp. 38–47. Tucson, AZ: Soc. Hist. Archaeol.
  87. Proust K, 1993, Australa. Hist. Archaeol., 11, 108
  88. 10.1007/BF03374179 · DOI
  89. Reitz EJ, Gibbs T, Rathbun TA. 1985.Archaeological evidence for subsistence on coastal plantations.InThe Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life, ed. TA Singleton, pp. 163–91. Orlando, FL: Academic
  90. 10.1007/BF03373603 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.2307/2946825 · DOI
  92. Sando RA, Felton DL. 1993.Inventory records of ceramics and opium from a nineteenth-century Chinese store in California.InHidden Heritage: Historical Archaeology of the Overseas Chinese, ed. P Wegars, pp. 151–76. Amityville, NY: Baywood
  93. Saunders AC de CM, 1982, A Social History of Black Slaves and Freedmen in Portugal, 1441–1555.
  94. Schuyler RL, 1974, Conf. Hist. Site Archaeol. Pap., 7, 13
  95. Schuyler RL, 1980, Archaeological Perspectives on Ethnicity in America: Afro-American and Asian American Culture History.
  96. Singleton TA. 1991.The archaeology of slave life.InBefore Freedom Came: African-American Life in the Antebellum South, ed. EDC Campbell, KS Rice, pp. 155–75. Richmond, VA: Mus. Confederacy
  97. 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.001003 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1017/CBO9780511523892 · DOI
  99. Souza Y de, 1963, Grandes Negros do Brasil.
  100. 10.2190/02NH-A9K2-9QHW-GCRM · DOI
  101. Staski E. 1993.The overseas Chinese in El Paso: changing goals, changing realities.InHidden Heritage: Historical Archaeology of the Overseas Chinese, ed. P Wegars, pp. 125–49. Amityville, NY: Baywood
  102. 10.1007/BF03374221 · DOI
  103. Swidler N, 1997, Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground.
  104. Thomas BW, 1995, Southeast. Archaeol., 14, 149
  105. Thornton JK, 1992, Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400-1680.
  106. Watters DR, 1987, Ann. Carnegie Mus., 56, 289, 10.5962/p.330591 · DOI
  107. Wheaton TR, Garrow PH. 1985.Acculturation and the archaeological record in the Carolina Lowcountry.InThe Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life, ed. TA Singleton, pp. 239–59. Orlando, FL: Academic
  108. Wilkie LA, 1995, Southeast. Archaeol., 14, 136
  109. Young AL, 1996, Tenn. Anthropol., 21, 139
  110. 10.1023/A:1027347620500 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Orser, C. E.
Affiliations
Anthropology Program, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790-4640;
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
1998-10
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
63-82
ISSN
  • 0084-6570
  • 1545-4290
Cited by
74
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review