The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nucleosynthesis in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: Relevance for Galactic Enrichment and Solar System Formation
Abstract
▪ Abstract We present a review of nucleosynthesis in AGB stars outlining the development of theoretical models and their relationship to observations. We focus on the new high resolution codes with improved opacities, which recently succeeded in accounting for the third dredge-up. This opens the possibility of understanding low luminosity C stars (enriched in s-elements) as the normal outcome of AGB evolution, characterized by production of 12 C and neutron-rich nuclei in the He intershell and by mass loss from strong stellar winds. Neutron captures in AGB stars are driven by two reactions:13 C(α,n)16 O, which provides the bulk of the neutron flux at low neutron densities (N n≤ 10 7 n/cm 3), and 22 Ne(α,n)25 Mg, which is mildly activated at higher temperatures and mainly affects the production of s-nuclei depending on reaction branchings. The first reaction is now known to occur in the radiative interpulse phase, immediately below the region previously homogenized by third dredge-up. The second reaction occurs during the convective thermal pulses. The resulting nucleosynthesis phenomena are rather complex and rule out any analytical approximation (exponential distribution of neutron fluences). Nucleosynthesis in AGB stars, modeled at different metallicities, account for several observational constraints, coming from a wide spectrum of sources: evolved red giants rich in s-elements, unevolved stars at different metallicities, presolar grains recovered from meteorites, and the abundances of s-process isotopes in the solar system. In particular, a good reproduction of the solar system main component is obtained as a result of Galactic chemical evolution that mixes the outputs of AGB stars of different stellar generations, born with different metallicities and producing different patterns of s-process nuclei. The main solar s-process pattern is thus not considered to be the result of a standard archetypal s-process occurring in all stars. Concerning the 13 C neutron source, its synthesis requires penetration of small amounts of protons below the convective envelope, where they are captured by the abundant 12 C forming a 13 C-rich pocket. This penetration cannot be modeled in current evolutionary codes, but is treated as a free parameter. Future hydrodynamical studies of time dependent mixing will be required to attack this problem. Evidence of other insufficiencies in the current mixing algorithms is common throughout the evolution of low and intermediate mass stars, as is shown by the inadequacy of stellar models in reproducing the observations of CNO isotopes in red giants and in circumstellar dust grains. These observations require some circulation of matter between the bottom of convective envelopes and regions close to the H-burning shell (cool bottom processing). AGB stars are also discussed in the light of their possible contribution to the inventory of short-lived radioactivities that were found to be alive in the early solar system. We show that the pollution of the protosolar nebula by a close-by AGB star may account for concordant abundances of 26 Al,41 Ca,60 Fe, and 107 Pd. The AGB star must have undergone a very small neutron exposure, and be of small initial mass ([Formula: see text]). There is a shortage of 26 Al in such models, that however remains within the large uncertainties of crucial reaction rates. The net 26 Al production problem requires further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Low-temperature Rosseland opacities
Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175039 · Cited by 1,161
Charbonnel, C. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309744 · Cited by 306
Circumstellar Envelopes and Mass Loss of Red Giant Stars
Reimers, D. (1975) · Problems in Stellar Atmospheres and Envelopes · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-80919-4_8 · Cited by 290
Carbon isotope ratios along the giant branch of M67
Gilroy, K. K., & Brown, J. A. (1991) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/169922 · Cited by 162
Boothroyd, A. I., & Sackmann, I.-J. (1988) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/166323 · Cited by 123
Predictions of oxygen isotope ratios in stars and of oxygen-rich interstellar grains in meteorites
Boothroyd, A. I., Sackmann, I.-J., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/187442 · Cited by 98
Self-citationSimulations of Galactic Chemical Evolution: B[CLC]a[/CLC] Enrichment
Raiteri, C. M., Villata, M., Gallino, R., Busso, M., & Cravanzola, A. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312079 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Cited by
The Discovery and Analysis of Very Metal-Poor Stars in the Galaxy
Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057 · Cited by 1,223
Evolution of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Herwig, F. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · Cited by 1,051
Neutron-Capture Elements in the Early Galaxy
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207 · Cited by 968
Self-citationThe Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“These are serious uncertainties and mostly arise from our inability to accurately model convection in stars (Busso et al. 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialGalactic Evolution of Sr, Y, and Zr: A Multiplicity of Nucleosynthetic Processes
Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., & Sneden, C. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/380507 · Cited by 635
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Busso, M., Gallino, R., & Wasserburg, G. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 239-309
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2131999259
- Cited by
- 1,177
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nucleosynthesis in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: Relevance for Galactic Enrichment and Solar System Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239
- The paper
- Busso, M., Gallino, R., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1999). Nucleosynthesis in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: Relevance for Galactic Enrichment and Solar System Formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.