The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
G PROTEIN MECHANISMS: Insights from Structural Analysis
Abstract
This review is concerned with the structures and mechanisms of a superfamily of regulatory GTP hydrolases (G proteins). G proteins include Ras and its close homologs, translation elongation factors, and heterotrimeric G proteins. These proteins share a common structural core, exemplified by that of p21 ras (Ras), and significant sequence identity, suggesting a common evolutionary origin. Three-dimensional structures of members of the G protein superfamily are considered in light of other biochemical findings about the function of these proteins. Relationships among G protein structures are discussed, and factors contributing to their low intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis are considered. Comparison of GTP- and GDP-bound conformations of G proteins reveals how specific contacts between the γ-phosphate of GTP and the switch II region stabilize potential effector-binding sites and how GTP hydrolysis results in collapse (or reordering) of these surfaces. A GTPase-activating protein probably binds to and stabilizes the conformation of its cognate G protein that recognizes the transition state for hydrolysis, and may insert a catalytic residue into the G protein active site. Inhibitors of nucleotide release, such as the β γ subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein, bind selectively to and stabilize the GDP-bound state. Release factors, such as the translation elongation factor, Ts, also recognize the switch regions and destabilize the Mg 2+-binding site, thereby promoting GDP release. G protein–coupled receptors are expected to operate by a somewhat different mechanism, given that the GDP-bound form of many G protein α subunits does not contain bound Mg 2+.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism
Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., & McCormick, F. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349117a0 · Cited by 3,392
A Cytoplasmic Protein Stimulates Normal N- ras p21 GTPase, But Does Not Affect Oncogenic Mutants
Trahey, M., & McCormick, F. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2821624 · Cited by 1,211
Kinetics of interaction of nucleotides with nucleotide-free H-ras p21
John, J., Sohmen, R., Feuerstein, J., Linke, R., Wittinghofer, A., & Goody, R. S. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00477a025 · Cited by 429
Cited by
Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor–Gs protein complex
Rasmussen, S. G. F., DeVree, B. T., Zou, Y., Kruse, A. C., Chung, K. Y., Kobilka, T. S., Thian, F. S., Chae, P. S., Pardon, E., Calinski, D., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10361 · Cited by 3,009
Chen, H., Detmer, S. A., Ewald, A. J., Griffin, E. E., Fraser, S. E., & Chan, D. C. (2003) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200211046 · Cited by 2,601
The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions
Vetter, I. R., & Wittinghofer, A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062023 · Cited by 1,875
Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes
Hilger, D., Masureel, M., & Kobilka, B. K. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-017-0011-7 · Cited by 969
Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts
Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C., Sinha, N., & Nussinov, R. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.1.10 · Cited by 595
Metadata
- Authors
- Sprang, S. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 639-678
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W2114460420
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: G PROTEIN MECHANISMS: Insights from Structural Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.639
- The paper
- Sprang, S. R. (1997). G PROTEIN MECHANISMS: Insights from Structural Analysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.