Cited by 429Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingBiochemical and Molecular ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Kinetics of interaction of nucleotides with nucleotide-free H-ras p21

John, Jacob, Sohmen, Roland, Feuerstein, Juergen, Linke, Rosita, Wittinghofer, Alfred, Goody, Roger S.·1990·Biochemistry

Abstract

A method is described for the convenient preparation of substantial quantities of nucleotide-free p21 or of 1:1 complexes with nucleotides other than GDP. The nucleotide-free protein has been used for kinetic studies of the binding of GDP and GTP, making use of the fluorescent analogues 3'-(methylanthraniloyl)-2'-deoxy-GDP and -GTP. Stopped-flow studies have led to the formulation of a two-step binding mechanism for both GDP and GTP, involving initial rapid but weak binding of the nucleotide followed by a relatively slow (10-20 s-1 at 25 degrees C; 3-5 s-1 at 5 degrees C) quasi-irreversible isomerization reaction. By use of a nonequilibrium competition method, guanosine and GMP have been shown to interact weakly but significantly with p21 (dissociation constants of 153 and 29 microM, respectively). The presence of guanosine or GMP at the active site of p21 leads to a marked stabilization of p21 against spontaneous denaturation when compared with the nucleotide- and nucleoside-free protein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00477a025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difficulty of drugging KRAS reflects picomolar RAS affinity for GTP, high intracellular GTP concentration of about 500 nM, and the absence of a deep or pharmacologically actionable small-molecule-binding pocket; GTP-competitive RAS inhibitors are therefore unfeasible.

    “The several-decade struggle to drug KRAS and other RAS isoforms25,61 reflects challenges posed by three key biochemical features: first, the picomolar affinity of RAS proteins for GTP62; second, the high intracellular concentrations of GTP (~500 nM)9; and third, the absence of a deep or pharmacologically actionable small-molecule-binding pocket in the RAS proteins.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, J., Sohmen, R., Feuerstein, J., Linke, R., Wittinghofer, A., & Goody, R. S.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1990-06
Volume
29
Issue
25
Pages
6058-6065
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2026128118
Cited by
429
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
p21ras, GDP binding, GTP binding, two-step binding mechanism, GTPase
MeSH terms
Guanosine, Guanosine Diphosphate, Guanosine Triphosphate, Kinetics, Nucleotides, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Oncogene Protein p21(ras), ortho-Aminobenzoates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review