Cited by 36Sex and Gender in HealthcareGender, Health, and Social InequalityGender Roles and Identity Studies

Women's mental health research: The emergence of a biomedical field

Blehar, Mary C.·2006·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This review surveys the field of women's mental health, with particular emphasis on its evolution into a distinct area of biomedical research. The field employs a biomedical disease model but it also emphasizes social and cultural influences on health outcomes. In recent years, its scope has expanded beyond studies of disorders occurring in women at times of reproductive transitions and it now encompasses a broader study of sex and gender differences. Historical and conceptual influences on the field are discussed. The review also surveys gender differences in the prevalence and clinical manifestations of mental disorders. Epidemiological findings have provided a rich resource for theory development, but without research tools to test theories adequately, findings of gender differences have begged the question of their biological, social, and cultural origins. Clinical depression is used to exemplify the usefulness of a sex/gender perspective in understanding mental illness; and major theories proposed to account for gender differences are critically evaluated. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary federal funding source for biomedical women's mental health research. The review surveys areas of emphasis in women's mental health research at the NIH as well as some collaborative activities that represent efforts to translate research findings into the public health and services arenas. As new analytic methods become available, it is anticipated that a more fundamental understanding of the biological and behavioral mechanisms underlying sex and gender differences in mental illness will emerge. Nonetheless, it is also likely that integration of findings predicated on different conceptual models of the nature and causes of mental illness will remain a challenge. These issues are discussed with reference to their impact on the field of women's mental health research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095344

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A bias towards pathologizing maternal experiences persists in maternal mental health research and practice.

    “Despite advances in maternal mental health, a bias towards pathologizing maternal experiences persists in research and practice.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blehar, M. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Blehar, Mary C.
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
135-160
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2106755070
Cited by
36
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
women's mental health, sex differences, gender differences, biomedical model of mental illness, reproductive transition, major depressive disorder, gender differences in mental illness, NIH funding, research translation
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Models, Psychological, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Terminology as Topic, Psychological Theory, Public Health, Reproduction, Research, Sex Factors, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, United States, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review