Women's mental health research: The emergence of a biomedical field
Abstract
This review surveys the field of women's mental health, with particular emphasis on its evolution into a distinct area of biomedical research. The field employs a biomedical disease model but it also emphasizes social and cultural influences on health outcomes. In recent years, its scope has expanded beyond studies of disorders occurring in women at times of reproductive transitions and it now encompasses a broader study of sex and gender differences. Historical and conceptual influences on the field are discussed. The review also surveys gender differences in the prevalence and clinical manifestations of mental disorders. Epidemiological findings have provided a rich resource for theory development, but without research tools to test theories adequately, findings of gender differences have begged the question of their biological, social, and cultural origins. Clinical depression is used to exemplify the usefulness of a sex/gender perspective in understanding mental illness; and major theories proposed to account for gender differences are critically evaluated. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary federal funding source for biomedical women's mental health research. The review surveys areas of emphasis in women's mental health research at the NIH as well as some collaborative activities that represent efforts to translate research findings into the public health and services arenas. As new analytic methods become available, it is anticipated that a more fundamental understanding of the biological and behavioral mechanisms underlying sex and gender differences in mental illness will emerge. Nonetheless, it is also likely that integration of findings predicated on different conceptual models of the nature and causes of mental illness will remain a challenge. These issues are discussed with reference to their impact on the field of women's mental health research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A bias towards pathologizing maternal experiences persists in maternal mental health research and practice.
“Despite advances in maternal mental health, a bias towards pathologizing maternal experiences persists in research and practice.”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder
Weissman, M. M. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540040037030 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., McGonagle, K. A., Edlund, M. J., Frank, R. G., & Leaf, P. J. (1996) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080151 · Cited by 1,378 · see citing works
Gaynes, B. N., Gavin, N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Lohr, K. N., Swinson, T., Gartlehner, G., Brody, S., & Miller, W. C. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e439372005-001 · Cited by 1,211 · see citing works
Sex differences in posttraumatic stress disorder
Breslau, N. (1997) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230082012 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Schmidt, P. J., Nieman, L. K., Danaceau, M. A., Adams, L. F., & Rubinow, D. R. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801223380401 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Social status and health in humans and other animals
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Gender differences in irritable bowel syndrome
Chang, L., & Heitkemper, M. M. (2002) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2002.36603 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Angold, A. (1993) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/0165-0327(93)90029-j · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Testosterone suppression of CRH-stimulated cortisol in men
Rubinow, D. R., Roca, C. A., Schmidt, P. J., Danaceau, M. A., Putnam, K., Cizza, G., Chrousos, G., & Nieman, L. (2005) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300742 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders
Russo, S. J., & Nestler, E. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3381 · Cited by 1,870 · see citing works
Are We Medicalizing Women’s Misery? A Critical Review of Women’s Higher Rates of Reported Depression
Ussher, J. M. (2010) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353509350213 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry
Athan, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364845 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blehar, M. C.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blehar, Mary C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-160
- ISSN
- 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-5951
- OpenAlex
- W2106755070
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- women's mental health, sex differences, gender differences, biomedical model of mental illness, reproductive transition, major depressive disorder, gender differences in mental illness, NIH funding, research translation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Models, Psychological, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Terminology as Topic, Psychological Theory, Public Health, Reproduction, Research, Sex Factors, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, United States, Women's Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review