The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song
Abstract
Songs are complex acoustic signals produced mainly during the mating season. Such signals are found in many taxa but are most typical of birds, frogs, and insects. Darwin (38) noted that in these groups males are the predominant singers, and for this reason he attributed the evolution of song to sexual selection, that is, selection due to competition for mates. Darwin could muster no direct evidence that song or other display influences mating suc cess; only recently has such evidence begun to accumulate. Our fIrst goal here is to review and evaluate evidence that song influences mating success, via either female choice or male contests. Although convinced that sexual selection shapes display behavior, Darwin could not explain the evolution of a relationship between display and mating success. Fisher (50) first gave such an explanation in his discussion of female choice and male threat display. Our second goal is to review ideas and evidence on the evolution of relationships between song and female choice, and between song and success in male contests. We focus on the question of why listeners have evolved to respond to song in the contexts of female choice and male contest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts
Maynard Smith, J. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6 · Cited by 2,410
Stimuli provided by courtship of male Drosophila melanogaster
BENNET-CLARK, H. C., & EWING, A. W. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/215669a0 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow
Møller, A. P. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/332640a0 · Cited by 631
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481
Song Learning, Early Nutrition and Sexual Selection in Songbirds
NOWICKI, S., PETERS, S., & PODOS, J. (1998) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/38.1.179 · Cited by 473
THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS
Gerhardt, H. C. (1994) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453 · Cited by 462
Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus
Kershenbaum, A., Blumstein, D. T., Roch, M. A., Akçay, Ç., Backus, G., Bee, M. A., Bohn, K., Cao, Y., Carter, G., Cäsar, C., et al. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12160 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Searcy, W.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 507-533
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117652954
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.17.1.507
- The paper
- Searcy, W. (1986). Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.17.1.507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.