The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS
Abstract
The most commonly heard vocalizations of frogs are advertisement calls, which attract gravid females and mediate aggressive interactions between males. Frog vocalizations are energetically costly to produce, and body size often constrains the dominant frequency and intensity of vocalizations; propagation and degradation of these signals are affected by diverse physical and biotic factors. Behaviors and auditory mechanisms that mitigate these problems are discussed. With some exceptions, female preferences based on dominant frequency are intensity-dependent and mediate stabilizing selection within populations. Female preferences based on dynamic, gross-temporal properties typically mediate strong directional selection. The high values of these properties preferred by females increase a male's detectability in dense choruses and are a reliable predictor of his energetic investment in courtship. Female preferences based on fine-temporal properties (e.g. pulse rate) are often intensity-independent and usually mediate stabilizing selection within populations. The overall attractiveness of a signal depends on variation in more than one of these acoustic properties; their relative importance differs between species. Parsimony analysis supports the idea that auditory biases preceded the evolutionary appearance of call elements that enhance the attractiveness of advertisement calls in one species group of neotropical frogs. A more specific claim that the bias has not been modified by selection after the establishment of the signal has little empirical support. Indeed, the selective consequences of positive phonotaxis to any new stimulus, whether or not there is a sensory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duellman, W. (1994) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801847806 · Cited by 4,526
The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350033a0 · Cited by 1,316
Wiley, R. H., & Richards, D. G. (1978) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00300047 · Cited by 1,106
Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song
Searcy, W. (1986) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.17.1.507 · Cited by 693
Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems
Endler, J. A. (1993) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0060 · Cited by 663
Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process.
Harrison, R. G. (1990) · Cited by 642
Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo
DAVIES, N. B., & HALLIDAY, T. R. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/274683a0 · Cited by 585
Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus
Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W., & Rand, A. S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343066a0 · Cited by 583
THE EVOLUTION OF MATING STRATEGIES IN BULLFROGS, RANA CATESBEIANA
Howard, R. D. (1978) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04639.x · Cited by 473
Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation.
Ryan, M. J. (1990) · Cited by 451
Cited by
Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape
Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S. L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B. M., Gage, S. H., & Pieretti, N. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6 · Cited by 1,334
What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8 · Cited by 730
Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species
Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A. (2008) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/590510 · Cited by 594
Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis
Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2022) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12890 · Cited by 273
“Among a variety of functions, acoustic signalling underpins mate choice, playing a key role in sexual selection (Gerhardt, 1994) and speciation (Tobias et al.”
BackgroundThe energetic basis of acoustic communication
Gillooly, J. F., & Ophir, A. G. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2134 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerhardt, H. C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 293-324
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2174242085
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453
- The paper
- Gerhardt, H. C. (1994). THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.