Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS

Gerhardt, H. Carl·1994·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

The most commonly heard vocalizations of frogs are advertisement calls, which attract gravid females and mediate aggressive interactions between males. Frog vocalizations are energetically costly to produce, and body size often constrains the dominant frequency and intensity of vocalizations; propagation and degradation of these signals are affected by diverse physical and biotic factors. Behaviors and auditory mechanisms that mitigate these problems are discussed. With some exceptions, female preferences based on dominant frequency are intensity-dependent and mediate stabilizing selection within populations. Female preferences based on dynamic, gross-temporal properties typically mediate strong directional selection. The high values of these properties preferred by females increase a male's detectability in dense choruses and are a reliable predictor of his energetic investment in courtship. Female preferences based on fine-temporal properties (e.g. pulse rate) are often intensity-independent and usually mediate stabilizing selection within populations. The overall attractiveness of a signal depends on variation in more than one of these acoustic properties; their relative importance differs between species. Parsimony analysis supports the idea that auditory biases preceded the evolutionary appearance of call elements that enhance the attractiveness of advertisement calls in one species group of neotropical frogs. A more specific claim that the bias has not been modified by selection after the establishment of the signal has little empirical support. Indeed, the selective consequences of positive phonotaxis to any new stimulus, whether or not there is a sensory

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Gerhardt, H. C.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1994-11
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
293-324
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2174242085
Cited by
462
References
75
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453
The paper
Gerhardt, H. C. (1994). THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.