The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating Gene Flow from Genetic Markers
Abstract
The estimation of gene flow from the distribution of genetic markers in populations requires an indirect approach. Gene flow parameters are defined by demographic models, and population genetic models provide the link between these parameters and the distributions of genetic markers. Following the introduction of allozyme methods in the 1960s, a standard approach to the estimation of gene flow was developed. Wright's island model of population structure was used to relate the distribution of allozyme alleles in populations to N e m, the product of the effective population size and the rate of migration. Alternative strategies for the estimation of gene flow have been developed using different genetic markers, different models of demography and population genetics, and different methods of parameter estimation. No alternative strategy now available is clearly superior to the standard approach based on Wright's model and allozyme markers. However, this may soon change as methods are developed that fully utilize the genealogical relationships of DNA sequences. At present, alternative strategies do fill important needs. They can provide independent estimates of gene flow, measure different components of gene flow, and detect historical changes in population structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Cited by
Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1)
Whitlock, M. C., & McCauley, D. E. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 · Cited by 1,544
POPULATION GENETICS, DEMOGRAPHIC CONNECTIVITY, AND THE DESIGN OF MARINE RESERVES
Palumbi, S. R. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0146:pgdcat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,207
Metapopulations and salmonids: a synthesis of life history patterns and empirical observations
Rieman, B. E., & Dunham, J. B. (2000) · Ecology of Freshwater Fish · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0633.2000.90106.x · Cited by 287
UNDERWOOD, J. N., SMITH, L. D., VAN OPPEN, M. J. H., & GILMOUR, J. P. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03187.x · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Neigel, J. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-128
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002204126
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating Gene Flow from Genetic Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.105
- The paper
- Neigel, J. E. (1997). A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating Gene Flow from Genetic Markers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.