The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is common in both plants and animals, and current evidence suggests that it reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. When species are compared within a clade, SSD is frequently found to vary with body size. This allometry is detected as β ≠ 1, where β is the slope of a model II regression of log(male size) on log(female size). Most frequently, β exceeds 1, indicating that SSD increases with size where males are the larger sex, but decreases with size where females are larger, a trend formalized as “Rensch's rule.” Exceptions are uncommon and associated with female-biased SSD. These trends are derived from a sample of 40 independent clades of terrestrial animals, primarily vertebrates. Their extension to plants and aquatic animals awaits quantitative assessments of allometry for SSD within these groups. Many functional hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of allometry for SSD, most featuring sexual selection on males or reproductive selection on females. Of these, the hypothesis that allometry evolves because of correlational selection between the sexes appears most promising as a general model but remains untested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Maddison, W. P. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x · Cited by 533
Cited by
Sexual size dimorphism in birds
Székely, T., Lislevand, T., & Figuerola, J. (2007) · Sex, Size and Gender Roles · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0004 · Cited by 160
The Evolution of Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism in Hawks, Falcons and Owls: A Comparative Study
Krüger, O. (2005) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-005-0293-9 · Cited by 150
Primate brain architecture and selection in relation to sex
Lindenfors, P., Nunn, C. L., & Barton, R. A. (2007) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-20 · Cited by 86
Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects
Teder, T., Kaasik, A., Taits, K., & Tammaru, T. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12762 · Cited by 59
DEVELOPMENT OF BODY MASS AND SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN DANISH RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES)
Pagh, S., Mariann, C., B, J., Cino, P., & Mette Sif, H. (2018) · GABJ · doi:10.46325/gabj.v2i1.112 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fairbairn, D. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 659-687
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144463262
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659
- The paper
- Fairbairn, D. J. (1997). Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.