The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tactics for Managing Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods: Theory and Practice
Abstract
The evolution of resistance to insecticides and acaricides by arthropod pests can be viewed and studied from two contrasting perspectives. At a fun damental level, resistance provides an almost ideal model of adaptation to withstand severe environmental stress. Work on the genetic (127, 128), biochemical (30, 82), and more recently, the molecular basis of resistance mechanisms (32) has cast light on the nature of this adaptation in several insect species, leading in some cases to diagnostic assays for specific genes or gene products (3, 22, 45). Similarly, population geneticists have exploited opportunities to analyze the selection of resistance in laboratory and field experiments (94, 95), and to predict, using theoretical models, how fast resistance genes are likely to evolve under different pesticide exposure re gimes ( l lS, 120). Unlike most evolutionary phenomena, however, resistance is also of great practical and economic significance. Not only have resistant species increased greatly in number (56), but the severity and extent of some resistance prob lems has increased alarmingly. For example, in some populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (6), and Colorado potato beetle, Lepti notarsa decemlineata (50), resistance to virtually all available insecticides has
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The excitant and repellent Effects on Mosquitos of sub-lethal Contacts with DDT
Kennedy, J. S. (1947) · Bulletin of Entomological Research · doi:10.1017/s0007485300030091 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Corbel, V., & N’Guessan, R. (2013) · Anopheles mosquitoes - New insights into malaria vectors · doi:10.5772/56117 · Cited by 136
Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States
Gassmann, A. J., & Reisig, D. D. (2023) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-105502 · Cited by 130
Tungu, P., Magesa, S., Maxwell, C., Malima, R., Masue, D., Sudi, W., Myamba, J., Pigeon, O., & Rowland, M. (2010) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-21 · Cited by 119
Self-citationApplying Ecological Principles of Crop Cultivation in Large-Scale Algal Biomass Production
Smith, V. H., & Crews, T. (2014) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2013.11.005 · Cited by 115
Oxborough, R. M., Kitau, J., Jones, R., Feston, E., Matowo, J., Mosha, F. W., & Rowland, M. W. (2014) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-13-37 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Denholm, I., & Rowland, M. W.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-112
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2127589172
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tactics for Managing Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods: Theory and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.000515
- The paper
- Denholm, I., & Rowland, M. W. (1992). Tactics for Managing Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods: Theory and Practice. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.000515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.