The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends
Abstract
▪ Abstract This review surveys five major efforts to identify and declare values essential to global sustainability; describes empirical trends (as measured by multinational and global-scale surveys) in values, attitudes, and behaviors related to human and economic development, the environment, and driving forces (population, affluence, technology, and entitlements); and describes empirical trends in attitudes toward contextual values that condition sustainable development (e.g., freedom and democracy, capitalism, globalization, and equality). Finally, the review identifies important barriers between attitudes and behavior; draws several conclusions regarding the value, attitudinal, and behavioral changes needed to achieve global sustainability; and suggests future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Cited by
Religion and climate change: varieties in viewpoints and practices
Haluza‐DeLay, R. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.268 · Cited by 207
The Rise of Artificial Intelligence under the Lens of Sustainability
Khakurel, J., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., Knutas, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies6040100 · Cited by 187
“…share the limited resources and great transitions in to First could be with an “open, inclusive, and continuing global dialogue about what ‘the good life’ should look like, how to live it, and the values, attitudes and behaviors, both individual and collective, that will support it” [91] (p. 41).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrebitus, C., Steiner, B., & Veeman, M. (2015) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.011 · Cited by 107
Influence of political leaders on sustainable development goals–insights from twitter
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Gupta, S., & Modgil, S. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2020-0304 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Leiserowitz, A. A., Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 413-444
- ISSN
- 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2050
- OpenAlex
- W2139179428
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
