The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Studies of Natural Selection in Bacteria
Abstract
Natural selection is the central concept in our formulation of evolutionary theory. Thus, it is important to study it and to understand its causes and effects by careful thought, observation, and experimentation. The effectshow selection changes gene frequencies have been extensively studied by population geneticists. The causes-how genetic variation within an environment creates selective differences have been less well studied because of many difficulties-such as understanding the development of the phenotype and defining the important components of the environment (19). This review describes experiments with microorganisms that provide insight into the causes of natural selection and consequently the evolutionary process, insights that are difficult or impossible to obtain if evolutionary biology concentrates solely on multicellular eukaryotic organisms. A statement of the importance of studying microorganisms to increase understanding of the evolutionary process is required because of the near total exclusion of microbiology from the neo-Darwinian synthesis (61, 101). This exclusion was not intentional but occurred in part because bacterial species and their phylogenetic relationships were nearly impossible to define until recently. Consequently, microbiology has remained the least evolution-oriented of the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Paquin, C., & Adams, J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302495a0 · Cited by 239
Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae
Paquin, C. E., & Adams, J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/306368a0 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Evolution Experiments with Microorganisms: The Dynamics and Genetic Bases of Adaptation
Elena, S. F., & Lenski, R. E. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1088 · Cited by 1,386
THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORS FIXED DURING ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION
Orr, H. A. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01823.x · Cited by 893
Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat
Balagaddé, F. K., You, L., Hansen, C. L., Arnold, F. H., & Quake, S. R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109173 · Cited by 599
Selection of a Multidrug Resistance Plasmid by Sublethal Levels of Antibiotics and Heavy Metals
Gullberg, E., Albrecht, L. M., Karlsson, C., Sandegren, L., & Andersson, D. I. (2014) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01918-14 · Cited by 559
Long-term survival during stationary phase: evolution and the GASP phenotype
Finkel, S. E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1340 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Dykhuizen, D. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 373-398
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036073976
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Studies of Natural Selection in Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002105
- The paper
- Dykhuizen, D. E. (1990). Experimental Studies of Natural Selection in Bacteria. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.