The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG MAXIMUM STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE, ECOSYSTEM SURFACE CONDUCTANCE, CARBON ASSIMILATION RATE, AND PLANT NITROGEN NUTRITION: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise
Abstract
This review provides a theoretical framework and global maps for relations between nitrogen-(N)-nutrition and stomatal conductance, gs' at the leaf scale and flUXe!1 of water vapor and carbon dioxide at the canopy scale. This theory defines the boundaries for observed rates of maximum surface conductance, Gsmax, and its relation to leaf area index, A, within a range of observed max imum stomatal conductances. gsmax. Soil evaporation compensates for the reduced contribution of plants to total ecosystem water loss at A < 4. Thus, Gsmax is fairly independent of changes in A for a broad range of vegetation types. The variation of Gsmax within these boundaries can be explained by effects of plant nutrition on stomatal conductance via effects on assimilation. Relations are established for the main global vegetation types among (i) maximum stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen concentrations with a slope of 0.3 mm s-I per mg N g-I, (ii) maximum surface conductance and stomatal conductance with a slope of 3 mm s-I in G per mm S-I in g, and (iii) maximum surface CO2 uptake and surface conductance with a slope of 1 /lmol m-2 s-1 in A per mm S-1 in G. Based on the distribution of leaf nitrogen in different vegetation types, predictions are made for maximum surface conductance and assimilation of carbon dioxide at a global scale. The review provides a basis for modeling and predicting feedforward and feedback effects between terres trial vegetation and global climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
SUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale
FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., & MOONEY, H. A. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x · Cited by 774
On the importance of including vegetation dynamics in Budyko's hydrological model
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., & McVicar, T. R. (2007) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-11-983-2007 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulze, E.-D., Kelliher, F. M., Körner, C., Lloyd, J., & Leuning, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 629-662
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181150263
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RELATIONSHIPS AMONG MAXIMUM STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE, ECOSYSTEM SURFACE CONDUCTANCE, CARBON ASSIMILATION RATE, AND PLANT NITROGEN NUTRITION: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.003213
- The paper
- Schulze, E.-D., Kelliher, F. M., Körner, C., Lloyd, J., & Leuning, R. (1994). RELATIONSHIPS AMONG MAXIMUM STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE, ECOSYSTEM SURFACE CONDUCTANCE, CARBON ASSIMILATION RATE, AND PLANT NITROGEN NUTRITION: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.003213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.