The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR NATURAL SELECTION
Abstract
neutral theory, nearly neutral theory, population genetics ABSTRACT Our understandi ng of the causes of molec ular evolution is not as certain as it was a decade ago when Kimura's neutral theory appeared to explain major features of DNA conservation and change. The last ten years have seen the development of empirical approaches and statistical tests for detecting selec tion in DNA and a proliferation of data that challenge our current understanding of the molecular evolutionary process. We begin this review with a discussion of protein polymorphism and divergence: two major areas of research where the strictly neutral model cannot explain general patterns in the data. We then present a survey of statistical methods for detecting positive selection, which includes tests for balancing selection, for sequence convergence, and for un usually high rates of evolution that cannot be accounted for by neutral models. Finally, we present findings of a number of groups working on within- and between-species variation in Drosophila: These highlight the importance of adaptive evolution, purifying selection, and recombination in understanding levels and patterns of nucleotide variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Nei, M. (1987) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/nei-92038 · Cited by 15,271
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
Gene genealogies and the coalescent process.
Hudson, R. R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,838
The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.
Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T., & Charlesworth, D. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289 · Cited by 1,803
Fundamentals of molecular evolution
(1991) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(91)90069-8 · Cited by 1,654
Mathematical Population Genetics
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A. (2006) · Oberwolfach Reports · doi:10.4171/owr/2005/40 · Cited by 1,624
Genetics of the Evolutionary Process.
Dobzhansky, T. (1970) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10742832 · Cited by 1,532
The causes of molecular evolution
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-2064 · Cited by 1,215
Lewontin, R. C., & Hubby, J. L. (1966) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/54.2.595 · Cited by 1,207
Cited by
Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics
Nielsen, R. (2001) · Heredity · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00895.x · Cited by 1,908
Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes
Broughton, W. J., Hernández, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., & Vanderleyden, J. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024146710611 · Cited by 1,511
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex
Piertney, S. B., & Oliver, M. K. (2006) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800724 · Cited by 937
Balancing Selection and Its Effects on Sequences in Nearby Genome Regions
Charlesworth, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020064 · Cited by 717
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreitman, M., & Akashi, H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 403-422
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2179885821
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR NATURAL SELECTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.002155
- The paper
- Kreitman, M., & Akashi, H. (1995). MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR NATURAL SELECTION. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.002155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.