The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MECHANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MISMATCH REPAIR
Abstract
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 LONG-PATCH MISMATCH CORRECTION . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 231 Specificity of Methyl-Directed Mismatch Repair in E. coli.. . ...... . . . ..... . .. . .... . . . . . . 231 Initiation of the Methyl-Directed Reaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 The Excision Reaction in Methyl-Directed Repair . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 235 Methyl-Directed Repair and Replication Fidelity . . . . ....... . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 238 mutHLSU Gene Products and the Recombination Heteroduplex..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 Long-Patch. Strand-Specific Mismatch Repair in Eukaryotic Cells . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 SHORT-PATCH MISMATCH REPAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ....... ......... 243 VSP Mismatch Correction in E. coli 243 MutY-Dependent G-A->G'C Mismatch Repair in E. coli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 244 ReeF-Dependent Resolution of Heteroduplex DNA in E. coli ... . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ........ 246 G-T->G' C Short-Patch Repair in Mammalian Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA
Duncan, B. K., & Miller, J. H. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/287560a0 · Cited by 792
FIDELITY MECHANISMS IN DNA REPLICATION
Echols, H., & Goodman, M. F. (1991) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002401 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli
Sniegowski, P. D., Gerrish, P. J., & Lenski, R. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42701 · Cited by 879
Kunkel, T. A. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r400006200 · Cited by 754
Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair
Marsischky, G. T., Filosi, N., Kane, M. F., & Kolodner, R. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.4.407 · Cited by 581
Base selection, proofreading, and mismatch repair during DNA replication in Escherichia coli.
Schaaper, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)80446-3 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Modrich, P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 229-253
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2014571977
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.