Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Genetics of Maize Evolution

Doebley, John·2004·Annual Review of Genetics
DOI 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract Maize and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes, differ strikingly in the morphology of their female inflorescences or ears. Despite their divergent morphologies, several studies indicate that some varieties of teosinte are cytologically indistinguishable from maize and capable of forming fully fertile hybrids with maize. Molecular analyses identified one form of teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) as the progenitor of maize. Analyses of the inheritance of the morphological traits that distinguish maize and teosinte indicates that they are under the control of multiple genes and exhibit quantitative inheritance. Nevertheless, these analyses have also identified a few loci of large effect that appear to represent key innovations during maize domestication. Remaining challenges are to identify additional major and minor effect genes, the polymorphisms within these genes that control the phenotypes, and how the combination of the individual and epistatic effects of these genes transformed teosinte into maize.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1007/BF01948608 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104728 · DOI
  3. Beadle GW, 1972, Field Museum Nat. Hist. Bull., 43, 2
  4. Beadle GW, 1978, Maize Breeding and Genetics, 113
  5. 10.1038/scientificamerican0180-112 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/281280 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2104 · DOI
  8. 10.1242/dev.00457 · DOI
  9. Calderon-Urrea A, 1999, Development, 126, 435, 10.1242/dev.126.3.435 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.2237049100 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Collins GN, 1919, J. Agric. Res., 17, 127
  12. Collins GN, 1920, J. Agric. Res., 19, 1
  13. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00444.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/978-94-009-1840-5_9 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF02860472 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Doebley JF, 2001, Genetics, 158, 487, 10.1093/genetics/158.2.487 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111434 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/2418824 · DOI
  19. Doebley JF, 1991, Genetics, 129, 285, 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Doebley JF, 1993, Genetics, 134, 559, 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Doebley JF, 1995, Genetics, 141, 333, 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/386485a0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9888 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2307/2446130 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.262.5131.233 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1007/BF01948609 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4441 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1126/science.289.5476.85 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4718 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1146/annurev.ge.05.120171.002311 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2407197 · DOI
  32. Galinat WC, 1977, Corn and Corn Improvement, 1
  33. Galinat WC, 1978, Maize Breeding and Genetics, 93
  34. Galinat WC, 1988, Corn and Corn Improvement, 1
  35. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1997 · DOI
  36. Grant V. 1975. Genetics of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 514 pp.
  37. Hilton H, 1998, Genetics, 150, 863, 10.1093/genetics/150.2.863 · DOI
  38. Hubbard L, 2002, Genetics, 162, 1927, 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1927 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1126/science.222.4626.886 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/BF02866598 · DOI
  41. Kato TA, 1976, Mass. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 635, 1
  42. Kempton JH, 1924, J. Agric. Res., 27, 537
  43. 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1607 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01294.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Langham DG, 1940, Genetics, 25, 88, 10.1093/genetics/25.1.88 · DOI
  46. Lauter N, 2002, Genetics, 160, 333, 10.1093/genetics/160.1.333 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/BF00022606 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/BF02872460 · DOI
  49. 10.1017/S0016672399004073 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60486-1 · DOI
  51. Mangelsdorf PC, 1952, Heterosis, 175
  52. 10.4159/harvard.9780674421707 · DOI
  53. Mangelsdorf PC, 1939, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 574
  54. 10.1073/pnas.052125199 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2101 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Rogers JS, 1950, Genetics, 35, 541, 10.1093/genetics/35.5.541 · DOI
  57. Schuman KM, 1904, P. Ascherson für Festschrift, 137
  58. 10.1007/s004389670004 · DOI
  59. 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/molbev/msh102 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1073/pnas.112324299 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Vinson A, 1877, Bull. Soc. Acclim., 24, 580
  63. 10.1073/pnas.202476999 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Wilkes HG. 1967. Teosinte: The Closest Relative of Maize. Cambridge, MA: Bussey Inst., Harvard Univ.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Doebley, J.
Venue
Annual Review of Genetics
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
37-59
ISSN
  • 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2948
DOI
10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425
OpenAlex
W2107904126
Cited by
661
References
1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.