The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks
Abstract
Large-scale genomic databases are becoming increasingly common. These databases, and the underlying biobanks, pose several substantial legal and ethical problems. Neither the usual methods for protecting subject confidentiality, nor even anonymity, are likely to protect subjects’ identities in richly detailed databases. Indeed, in these settings, anonymity is itself ethically suspect. New methods of consent will need to be created to replace the blanket consent common to such endeavors, with a consent procedure that gives subjects some real control over what they might consider inappropriate use of their information and biological material. Through their use, these biobanks are also likely to yield information that will be of some clinical significance to the subjects, information that they should have access to. Failure to adjust to these new challenges is not only legally and ethically inappropriate, but puts at risk the political support on which biomedical research depends.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
Cited by
Privacy in the age of medical big data
Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7 · Cited by 1,522
Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy
Erlich, Y., & Narayanan, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3723 · Cited by 458
Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research
Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. L. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002 · Cited by 279
Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research
Murphy, J., Scott, J., Kaufman, D., Geller, G., LeRoy, L., & Hudson, K. (2008) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160802513093 · Cited by 278
Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic Research
McGuire, A. L., & Beskow, L. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Greely, H. T.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 343-364
- ISSN
- 1527-8204 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-293X
- OpenAlex
- W2142185679
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115721
- The paper
- Greely, H. T. (2007). The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic Biobanks. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.