CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 490Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NEURAL SELECTION AND CONTROL OF VISUALLY GUIDED EYE MOVEMENTS

Schall, Jeffrey D., Thompson, Kirk G.·1999·Annual Review of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.241
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract We review neural correlates of perceptual and motor decisions, examining whether the time they occupy explains the duration and variability of behavioral reaction times. The location of a salient target is identified through a spatiotemporal evolution of visually evoked activation throughout the visual system. Selection of the target leads to stochastic growth of movement-related activity toward a fixed threshold to generate the gaze shift. For a given image, the neural concomitants of perceptual processing occupy a relatively constant interval so that stochastic variability in response generation introduces additional variability in reaction times.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.241

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Allman JM, 1985, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 532
  2. Carpenter RHS, 1988, Movements of the Eyes.
  3. Carpenter RHS, 1991, Eye Movements.
  4. 10.1037//0096-3445.111.1.135 · DOI
  5. Hanes DP, 1998, Vision Res.
  6. Patterson WF, 1997, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 23, 474
  7. Ratcliff R, 1998, Psychol. Rev.
  8. Schall JD. 1991b. Neuronal basis of saccadic eye movements. InThe Neural Basis of Visual Function, ed. AG Leventhal, pp. 388–442. London: Macmillan
  9. Thompson KG, 1997, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 23, 303

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 490

Related

Metadata

Authors
Schall, J. D., & Thompson, K. G.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
ORCID
Schall, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
1999-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
241-259
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
DOI
10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.241
OpenAlex
W2051105882
Cited by
489
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH055806, R01-MH55806)
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY08890, P30-EY08126, R01EY008890, P30EY008126)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visually guided eye movements, saccade selection, perceptual decision making, motor decision-making, reaction time variability, target detection, gaze shifts, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Animals, Eye Movements, Humans, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Psychomotor Performance, Saccades, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review