CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,633Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 280 of the 280 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BIRDSONG AND HUMAN SPEECH: Common Themes and Mechanisms

Doupe, Allison J., Kuhl, Patricia K.·1999·Annual Review of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract Human speech and birdsong have numerous parallels. Both humans and songbirds learn their complex vocalizations early in life, exhibiting a strong dependence on hearing the adults they will imitate, as well as themselves as they practice, and a waning of this dependence as they mature. Innate predispositions for perceiving and learning the correct sounds exist in both groups, although more evidence of innate descriptions of species-specific signals exists in songbirds, where numerous species of vocal learners have been compared. Humans also share with songbirds an early phase of learning that is primarily perceptual, which then serves to guide later vocal production. Both humans and songbirds have evolved a complex hierarchy of specialized forebrain areas in which motor and auditory centers interact closely, and which control the lower vocal motor areas also found in nonlearners. In both these vocal learners, however, how auditory feedback of self is processed in these brain areas is surprisingly unclear. Finally, humans and songbirds have similar critical periods for vocal learning, with a much greater ability to learn early in life. In both groups, the capacity for late vocal learning may be decreased by the act of learning itself, as well as by biological factors such as the hormones of puberty. Although some features of birdsong and speech are clearly not analogous, such as the capacity of language for meaning, abstraction, and flexible associations, there are striking similarities in how sensory experience is internalized and used to shape vocal outputs, and how learning is enhanced during a critical period of development. Similar neural mechanisms may therefore be involved.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567

Cites

280 of 280 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–280 of 280

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Abramson AS, Lisker ,L. 1970. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: cross-language tests. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Prague 1967 , pp. 569–73. Prague: Academia
  2. Baptista LF, 1981, Auk, 98, 383
  3. Best CT. 1988. The emergence of cerebral asymmetries in early human development: a literature review and a neuroembryological model. In Brain Lateralization in Children: Developmental Implications , ed. DL Molfese, SJ Segalowitz, pp. 5–34. New York: Guilford
  4. Brainard MS, 1997, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 23, 796
  5. Burnham DK, Earnshaw LJ, Quinn MC. 1987. The development of the categorical identification of speech. In Perceptual Development in Early Infancy: Problems and Issues , ed. BE McKenzie, RH Day, pp. 237–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  6. Doupe AJ. 1998. Development and learning in the birdsong system: Are there shared mechanisms? In Mechanistic Relationships Between Development and Learning , ed. TJ Carew, R Menzel, CJ Shatz, pp. 111–30. New York: Wiley
  7. Gaunt AS. 1987. Phonation. In Bird Respiration , ed. TJ. Seller, pp. 71–94. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
  8. Geschwind N, 1978, Fed. Proc., 37, 2263
  9. 10.1037//0012-1649.24.1.14 · DOI
  10. Hessler N, 1998, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 24, 191
  11. Jakobson R, 1969, Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates.
  12. 10.1037//0735-7036.110.4.354 · DOI
  13. Jusczyk PW. 1981. Infant speech perception: a critical appraisal. In Perspectives on the Study of Speech , ed. PD Eimas, JL Miller, pp. 113–64. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  14. Kroodsma DE, 1985, Wilson Bull., 97, 21
  15. Kuhl PK, 1986, Exp. Biol., 45, 233
  16. Kuhl PK. 1987. Perception of speech and sound in early infancy. In Handbook of Infant Perception , Vol. 2, From Perception to Cognition , ed. P Salapatek, L Cohen, pp. 275–382. New York: Academic
  17. Kuhl PK. 1989. On babies, birds, modules, and mechanisms: a comparative approach to the acquisition of vocal communication. SeeDooling & Hulse 1989, pp. 379–419
  18. Kuhl PK. 1998. The development of speech and language. In Mechanistic Relationships Between Development and Learning , ed. TJ Carew, R Menzel, CJ Shatz, pp. 53–73. New York: Wiley
  19. Kuhl PK, 1998, J. Exp. Psych.: Gen.
  20. L'Hermitte F, 1971, Rev. Neurol., 124, 329
  21. Marler P, 1970, Am. Sci., 58, 669
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<501::AID-NEU2>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  23. Marler P, Peters S. 1989. Species differences in auditory responsiveness in early vocal learning. SeeDooling & Hulse 1989, pp. 243–73
  24. Newport EL. 1991. Contrasting conceptions of the critical period for language. In Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition , ed. S Carey, R Gelman, pp. 111–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  25. Ojemann G, 1990, Semin. Neurosci., 2, 297
  26. Oyama S, 1978, Work. Pap. Biling., 16, 1
  27. Plant G, Hammarberg B. 1983. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of the speech of the deafened. Speech Trans. Lab. Q. Prog. Stat. Rep . 2/3:85–107
  28. Posner MI, 1994, Images of Mind.
  29. Pytte C, 1996, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 21, 693
  30. Soha JA. 1995. Cues for selective learning of conspecific song by young white-crowned sparrows. MSc thesis. Univ. Calif., Davis. 65 pp.
  31. Solis M, 1996, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 22, 152
  32. Stevens KN. 1994. Scientific substrates of speech production. In Introduction to Communication Sciences and Disorders , ed. FD Minifie, pp. 399–437. San Diego, CA: Singular
  33. Stoel-Gammon C. 1992. Prelinguistic vocal development: measurement and predictions. In Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications , ed. CA Ferguson, L Menn, C Stoel-Gammon, pp. 439–56. Timonium, MD: York
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<632::AID-NEU10>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  35. Tallal P, 1994, J. Med. Speech Lang. Pathol., 2, 23
  36. Tramontin AD, 1997, Soc. Neurosci., 22, 1328
  37. Tyler RS. 1993. Speech perception by children. In Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations , ed. RS Tyler, pp. 191–256. San Diego, CA: Singular
  38. 10.1037//0735-7036.109.3.211 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<653::AID-NEU11>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,633

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Kuhl, Patricia K.
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
1999-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
567-631
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
DOI
10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567
OpenAlex
W2102224657
Cited by
1,633
References
280
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 76
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01dc000520-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH55987, R01MH055987)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC00520)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 34835, P01NS034835)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
bird song, human speech, vocal learning, songbirds, auditory feedback, critical period, auditory-motor interaction, innate predispositions, perceptual learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Learning, Perception, Speech, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review