The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Genomics on Drug Discovery
Abstract
High-throughput gene sequencing has revolutionized the process used to identify novel molecular targets for drug discovery. Thousands of new gene sequences have been generated but only a limited number of these can be converted into validated targets likely to be involved in disease. We describe here some of the approaches used at SmithKline Beecham to select and validate novel targets. These include the identification of selective tissue gene product expression, such as for cathepsin K, a novel osteoclast-specific cysteine protease. We also describe the discovery and functional characterization of novel members of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily and their pairing with natural ligands. Lastly, we discuss the promises of gene microarrays and proteomics, developing technologies that allow the parallel analyses of tissue expression patterns of thousands of genes or proteins, respectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The practice of studying genetic disorders is changing from investigation of single genes in isolation to discovering cellular networks of genes, understanding their complex interactions, and identifying their role in disease.”
From Bioinformatics (2002) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Sakurai, T., Amemiya, A., Ishii, M., Matsuzaki, I., Chemelli, R. M., Tanaka, H., Williams, S. C., Richardson, J. A., Kozlowski, G. P., Wilson, S., et al. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80949-6 · Cited by 5,501
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Adams MD, Kelley JM, Gocayne JD, Dubnick M, Polymeropoulos MH, et al. 1991. Complementary DNA sequencing: expressed sequence tags and human genome project.Science252:1651–56 · DOI
- Pandey A, Lewitter F. 1999. Nucleotide sequence databases: a gold mine for biologists.Trends Biochem. Sci.24:276–80 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01316-5 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.6.9.807 · DOI
- 10.1177/39.7.1865107 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12511 · DOI · Paper page
- Bossard MJ, Tomaszek TA, Thompson SK, Amegadzie BY, Hanning CR, et al. 1996. Proteolytic activity of human osteoclast cathepsin K: expression, purification, activation and substrate identification.J. Biol. Chem.271:12517–24 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.273.5279.1236 · DOI
- Saftig P, Hunziker E, Wehmeyer O, Jones S, Boyde A, et al. 1998. Impaired osteoclastic bone resorption leads to osteopetrosis in cathepsin-K-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95:13453–58 · DOI · Paper page
- Gowen M, Lazner F, Dodds R, Field J, Tavaria M, et al. 1999. Cathepsin K knockout mice develop osteopetrosis due to a deficit in matrix degradation but not demineralization.J. Bone Miner. Res.In press · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb0297-109 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja972204u · DOI
- 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.9.1396 · DOI
- 1981, Cancer Res., 41, 894
- 1971, J. Biol. Chem., 246, 3210, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62216-1 · DOI
- Stadel JM, Wilson S, Bergsma DJ. 1997. Orphan G protein-coupled receptors: a neglected opportunity for pioneer drug discovery.TrendsPharmacol. Sci.18:430–37 · DOI
- 10.1038/22313 · DOI
- 1990, J. Pharm. Exp. Ther., 252, 711
- Clitherow JW, Scopes DIC, Skingle M, Jordan CC, Feniuk W, et al. 1994. Evolution of a novel series of [(N,N-dimethylamino)propyl]- and piperazinylbenzanilides as the first selective 5-HT1Dantagonists. J. Med. Chem.37:2253–57 · DOI
- Elliott JD, Bryan DL, Nambi P, Ohlstein EH. 1996. A novel series of non-peptide endothelin receptor antagonists. InPeptides: Chemistry, Structure and Biology,ed.PTP Kaumaya, RS Hodges, pp. 673– 75. Kingswinford, UK: Mayflower Sci.
- 10.1021/ja00153a024 · DOI
- 1997, Nature, 387, 7
- C. elegansSequencing Consort. 1998. Genome sequence of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans.A platform for investigating biology.Science282:2012– 18 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1296-1675 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.270.5235.467 · DOI · Paper page
- Mooney J, Kayne P, O’Brien S, Debouck C. 2000. Construction and applications of gene microarrays on nylon membranes. InPCR5: Differential Display: A Practical Approach,ed. R Leslie, H Robertson. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. In press · DOI
- 10.1038/4475 · DOI
- Wang T, Brown MJ. 1999. mRNA quantification by real time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction: validation and comparison with RNase protection.Anal. Biochem.269:198–201 · DOI
- Blackstock WP, Weir MP. 1999. Proteomics: quantitative and physical mapping of cellular proteins.Trends Biotechnol.17:121–27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi982093r · DOI
- 10.1038/10890 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01355-3 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.8.4.362 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80054-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.281.5384.1820 · DOI
- Pope AJ, Haupts UM, Moore KJ. 1998. Homogeneous fluorescence readouts for miniaturized high-throughput screening: theory and practice.Drug Disc. Today4:350–62 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.177 · DOI
Cited by
Drug development in the era of precision medicine
Dugger, S. A., Platt, A., & Goldstein, D. B. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.226 · Cited by 493
Bayat, A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1018 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Debouck, C., & Metcalf, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 193-208
- ISSN
- 0362-1642
- 1545-4304
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Genomics on Drug Discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.193
- The paper
- Debouck, C., & Metcalf, B. (2000). The Impact of Genomics on Drug Discovery. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.