The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hormesis: The Dose-Response Revolution
Abstract
Hormesis, a dose-response relationship phenomenon characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition, has been frequently observed in properly designed studies and is broadly generalizable as being independent of chemical/physical agent, biological model, and endpoint measured. This under-recognized and -appreciated concept has the potential to profoundly change toxicology and its related disciplines with respect to study design, animal model selection, endpoint selection, risk assessment methods, and numerous other aspects, including chemotherapeutics. This article indicates that as a result of hormesis, fundamental changes in the concept and conduct of toxicology and risk assessment should be made, including (a) the definition of toxicology, (b) the process of hazard (e.g., including study design, selection of biological model, dose number and distribution, endpoint measured, and temporal sequence) and risk assessment [e.g., concept of NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level), low dose modeling, recognition of beneficial as well as harmful responses] for all agents, and (c) the harmonization of cancer and noncancer risk assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diamond, D. M., Bennett, M. C., Fleshner, M., & Rose, G. M. (1992) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450020409 · Cited by 688
‘Radiation hormesis: data and interpretations’.
Upton, A. C. (2001) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/20014091111956 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Moderate exercise is an antioxidant: Upregulation of antioxidant genes by training
Gomez-Cabrera, M.-C., Domenech, E., & Viña, J. (2008) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.02.001 · Cited by 1,020
Kell, D. B. (2010) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-010-0577-x · Cited by 361
Ruiz-Núñez, B., Pruimboom, L., Dijck-Brouwer, D. A. J., & Muskiet, F. A. J. (2013) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.02.009 · Cited by 246
Hormesis, cellular stress response and vitagenes as critical determinants in aging and longevity
Calabrese, V., Cornelius, C., Cuzzocrea, S., Iavicoli, I., Rizzarelli, E., & Calabrese, E. J. (2011) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2011.10.007 · Cited by 197
Self-citationReview of Aquatic Toxicity of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products to Algae
Xin, X., Huang, G., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124619 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Calabrese, E. J., & Baldwin, L. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-197
- ISSN
- 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4304
- OpenAlex
- W2155559447
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hormesis: The Dose-Response Revolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223
- The paper
- Calabrese, E. J., & Baldwin, L. A. (2003). Hormesis: The Dose-Response Revolution. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.