The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TENSEGRITY: THE ARCHITECTURAL BASIS OF CELLULAR MECHANOTRANSDUCTION
Abstract
▪ Abstract Physical forces of gravity, hemodynamic stresses, and movement play a critical role in tissue development. Yet, little is known about how cells convert these mechanical signals into a chemical response. This review attempts to place the potential molecular mediators of mechanotransduction (e.g. stretch-sensitive ion channels, signaling mollecules, cytoskeleton, integrins) within the context of the structural complexity of living cells. The model presented relies on recent experimental findings, which suggests that cells use tensegrity architecture for their organization. Tensegrity predicts that cells are hard-wired to respond immediately to mechanical stresses transmitted over cell surface receptors that physically couple the cytoskeleton to extracellular matrix (e.g. integrins) or to other cells (cadherins, selectins, CAMs). Many signal transducing molecules that are activated by cell binding to growth factors and extracellular matrix associate with cytoskeletal scaffolds within focal adhesion complexes. Mechanical signals, therefore, may be integrated with other environmental signals and transduced into a biochemical response through force-dependent changes in scaffold geometry or molecular mechanics. Tensegrity also provides a mechanism to focus mechanical energy on molecular transducers and to orchestrate and tune the cellular response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction
Davies, P. F. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.519 · Cited by 2,802
Malek, A. M., & Izumo, S. (1996) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.109.4.713 · Cited by 531
Extracellular matrix controls tubulin monomer levels in hepatocytes by regulating protein turnover.
Mooney, D. J., Hansen, L. K., Langer, R., Vacanti, J. P., & Ingber, D. E. (1994) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.5.12.1281 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Cited by
Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again
Ingber, D. E. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-5424rev · Cited by 1,627
Self-citationBiomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells☆
SURESH, S. (2007) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002 · Cited by 1,284
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Chang, R., Nam, J., & Sun, W. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.a.2007.0004 · Cited by 549
Karagiannis, G. S., Poutahidis, T., Erdman, S. E., Kirsch, R., Riddell, R. H., & Diamandis, E. P. (2012) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-12-0307 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingber, D. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 575-599
- ISSN
- 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1585
- OpenAlex
- W2126087366
- Cited by
- 1,566
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TENSEGRITY: THE ARCHITECTURAL BASIS OF CELLULAR MECHANOTRANSDUCTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.575
- The paper
- Ingber, D. E. (1997). TENSEGRITY: THE ARCHITECTURAL BASIS OF CELLULAR MECHANOTRANSDUCTION. Annual Review of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.