The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E COLOGY OF M YCORRHIZAE: A Conceptual Framework for Complex Interactions Among Plants and Fungi
Abstract
▪ Abstract Mycorrhizae regulate elemental and energy flows in terrestrial ecosystems. We understand much of how mycorrhizae work, but integrating all possible mechanisms into a whole has proven elusive. Multiple evolutionary events and the long evolutionary history mean that different plants and fungi bring independent characteristics to the symbiosis. This variety results in extensive physiological variation. How do we integrate functional responses with diversity to understand the role of mycorrhizae in ecosystems? We review ecophysiological mechanisms of mycorrhizae and organize these into functional groups. Species-area relationships are not curvilinear, but resemble the “broken stick” model. We coupled functional groups with a metacommunity analysis to show how complex behavior can be generated using a simple matrix model of resource exchange. This approach provides insights into how we might integrate diversity and function across landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walker, B., Kinzig, A., & Langridge, J. (1999) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900062 · Cited by 1,062
Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry?
Loladze, I. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02587-9 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals
Harms, H., Schlosser, D., & Wick, L. Y. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2519 · Cited by 1,111
Mycorrhizal Fungi: Highways for Water and Nutrients in Arid Soils
Allen, M. F. (2007) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0068 · Cited by 448
Self-citationGonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, M. F., Swenson, W., Querejeta, J. I., Egerton-Warburton, L. M., & Treseder, K. K.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 271-303
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2166380229
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E COLOGY OF M YCORRHIZAE: A Conceptual Framework for Complex Interactions Among Plants and Fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095518
- The paper
- Allen, M. F., Swenson, W., Querejeta, J. I., Egerton-Warburton, L. M., & Treseder, K. K. (2003). E COLOGY OF M YCORRHIZAE: A Conceptual Framework for Complex Interactions Among Plants and Fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.