The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE PARTY FAMILY AND ITS STUDY
Abstract
▪ Abstract Although the notion of the party family, with the various cross-national and cross-temporal similarities it implies, underlies much of the standard work on comparative party politics, it nevertheless remains one of the most under-theorized and least specified approaches to the general classification of parties. Four of the principal approaches that are used to identify party families are discussed: origins and sociology, transnational links, policy and ideology, and party name. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are assessed, as are some of the more generic problems that may be associated with all four approaches. The two approaches that appear best suited to the specification and classification of party families are those based on the origin of parties and their ideology, but these should be developed in parallel rather than as alternatives. Both tap into what parties are rather than what parties do and hence are more likely to uncover core identities and shared political goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics
Sartori, G. (1970) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958356 · Cited by 3,318
Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State
Duverger, M. (1964) · Cited by 2,109
Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State
Chapman, B. (1955) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2604342 · Cited by 1,812
Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe
Betz, H.-G. (1994) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-23547-6 · Cited by 1,497
Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies
Huber, J., & Inglehart, R. (1995) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068895001001004 · Cited by 1,161
Bartolini, S., & Mair, P. (1990) · Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) · Cited by 1,098
Self-citationMultiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe
(1991) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90033-o · Cited by 966
Laver, M., & Hunt, W. B. (1992) · Cited by 940
Parties, policies, and democracy
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-6464 · Cited by 917
Left–Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments
Castles, F. G., & Mair, P. (1984) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1984.tb00080.x · Cited by 909
Self-citation
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Vox como representante de la derecha radical en España: un estudio sobre su ideología
Ferreira, C. (2019) · Revista Española de Ciencia Política · doi:10.21308/recp.51.03 · Cited by 361
The European Voter: A Comparative Study Of Modern Democracies
Thomassen, J. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199273219.001.0001 · Cited by 279
Norris, P. (2020) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068820927686 · Cited by 258
A Common Left-Right Scale for Voters and Parties in Europe
Lo, J., Proksch, S.-O., & Gschwend, T. (2014) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt028 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Mair, P., & Mudde, C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 211-229
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2113047693
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PARTY FAMILY AND ITS STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.211
- The paper
- Mair, P., & Mudde, C. (1998). THE PARTY FAMILY AND ITS STUDY. Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.