Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

D ELIBERATIVE D EMOCRATIC T HEORY

Chambers, Simone·2003·Annual Review of Political Science
DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract Deliberative democratic theory has moved beyond the “theoretical statement” stage and into the “working theory” stage. Although this essay revisits some of the main theoretical debates, this is done via a survey and evaluation of the state of deliberative democratic theory as it is being applied in a number of research areas and as it intersects with related normative debates. Five research areas are covered: public law, international relations, policy studies, empirical research, and identity politics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Ackerman B, 1991, We the People: Foundations.
  2. Ackerman B, 1998, We the People: Transformations.
  3. 10.1111/1467-9760.00146 · DOI
  4. Arato A. 1998. Procedural law and civil society: interpreting the radical democratic paradigm. In Habermas on Law and Democracy , ed. M Rosenfeld, A Arato, pp. 26–36. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press · doi:10.1525/9780520917613-004
  5. Archibugi D, 2000, New Left Rev., 4, 137
  6. Benhabib S, 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics.
  7. Benhabib S, 1996, Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political., 10.1515/9780691234168 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1515/9780691186542 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/0090591795023002004 · doi:10.1177/0090591795023002004
  10. Bohman J, 1996, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy.
  11. Bohman J. 1997. The public spheres of the world citizen. In Perpetual Peace: Essays in Kant's Cosmopolitanism , ed. J Bohman, M Lutz-Bachman, pp. 179–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  12. 10.1111/1467-9760.00061 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/019145379802400213 · doi:10.1177/019145379802400213
  14. 10.1111/1468-2346.00090 · DOI
  15. 10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.2307/3235238 · doi:10.2307/3235238
  17. Chambers S, 1996, Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse., 10.7591/9781501722547 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/0032329298026001006 · DOI
  19. Chambers S. 2002. Can procedural democracy be radical? In Studies in Contemporary Continental Political Philosophy , ed. D Ingram, pp. 168–88. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  20. Cohen J. 1997. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. SeeBohman & Rehg 1997, pp. 67–91 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/1467-8675.00157 · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00157
  22. Cohen JL, 2002, Regulating Intimacy: a New Legal Paradigm.
  23. Connolly W, 1999, Why I Am Not a Secularist.
  24. Daniels N, 1991, JAMA, 265, 2332, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460170086039 · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460170086039
  25. 10.1177/0090591701029005002 · doi:10.1177/0090591701029005002
  26. 10.5840/soctheorpract200026310 · doi:10.5840/soctheorpract200026310
  27. Deveaux M, 2000, Cultural Pluralism and the Dilemmas of Justice., 10.7591/9781501723759 · doi:10.7591/9781501723759
  28. Dryzek JK, 2000, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestation.
  29. Dworkin R, 1996, Freedom's Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution.
  30. Elster J. 1997. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. SeeBohman & Rehg 1997, pp. 3–33 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1017/CBO9781139175005 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Elster J. 1998b. Deliberation and constitution making. SeeElster 1998a, pp. 97–122 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Eriksen E, 2000, Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation.
  34. 10.1007/BF00999715 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1215/9780822381815 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Fishkin J, 1995, The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy.
  37. Fishkin J, Luskin R. 1999. Bringing deliberation to the democratic dialogue: the NIC and beyond. In A Poll with a Human Face:the National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication , ed. M McCombs, A Reynolds, pp. 30–38. New York: Erlbaum
  38. Flaven C, 1996, Public Persp., 7, 46
  39. Fraser N. 1993. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actual existing democracy. In Habermas and the Public Sphere , ed. C Calhoun, pp. 109–42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  40. Fraser N, 1997, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition.
  41. Fraser N, 2003, Redistribution or Recognition? A Philosophical Exchange.
  42. Freeman S, 2000, Philos. Public Aff., 29, 370, 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. Gastil J, 1996, Deliberation at the National Issues Convention.
  44. Gastil J, 2000, By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections., 10.1525/9780520925007 · DOI
  45. Gastil J, 1995, Understanding Public Deliberation.
  46. Gould C. 1996. Diversity and democracy: representing difference. SeeBenhabib 1996, pp. 171–86 · doi:10.1515/9780691234168-010
  47. Gutmann A, 1999, J. Dispute Resolut., 15, 1
  48. Gutmann A, 1996, Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics, and What Should Be Done about It.
  49. 10.2307/3528667 · doi:10.2307/3528667
  50. 10.1111/1467-9760.00147 · DOI
  51. 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Habermas J, 1998, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory.
  53. Habermas J, 2001, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essay.
  54. 10.1177/0090591701029006002 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Habermas J, 2001, New Left Rev., 11, 5
  56. Held D, 1995, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance.
  57. Honig B, 2002, Polit. Theory, 29, 792, 10.1177/0090591701029006004 · doi:10.1177/0090591701029006004
  58. Hooghe M, 1999, Acta Polit., 4, 287
  59. 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00277.x · DOI
  60. Kelly M, 1998, Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate.
  61. Laden A, 2000, Reasonably Radical: Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity.
  62. Macedo S, 1999, Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement., 10.1093/oso/9780195131918.001.0001 · DOI
  63. Majone G. 1990. Policy analysis and public deliberation. In The Power of Public Idea , ed. R Reich, pp. 157–78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  64. Mansbridge J. 1996. Using power/fighting power: the polity. SeeBenhabib 1996, pp. 44–66 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00066.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00066.x
  66. 10.1177/0090591700028001003 · doi:10.1177/0090591700028001003
  67. 10.1080/105846000198468 · DOI
  68. 10.1086/297775 · doi:10.1086/297775
  69. 10.2307/796539 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Michelman F. 1996. Constitutional authorship. In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations , ed. L Alexander, pp. 64–98. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  71. Michelman F, 1999, Brennan and Democracy., 10.1515/9781400823369 · doi:10.1515/9781400823369
  72. Mitofsky W, 1996, Public Persp., 7, 17
  73. Mouffe C, 2000, The Democratic Paradox.
  74. Nino CS, 1996, The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy.
  75. O'Connell D, 1995, Polit. Sci. Politics, 28, 230, 10.2307/420352 · doi:10.2307/420352
  76. 10.1023/A:1004641300366 · DOI
  77. Phillips A, 1995, The Politics of Presence: Issues in Democracy and Group Representation.
  78. Preuss U, 1995, Constitutional Revolution: the Link Between Constitutionalism and Progress.
  79. 10.1093/ijpor/10.2.145 · DOI
  80. Quell C, 1998, Can. Ethn. Stud., 30, 173
  81. Rawls J, 1999, The Law of Peoples.
  82. 10.1177/0090591799027001003 · doi:10.1177/0090591799027001003
  83. Remer G, 2000, J Polit. Philos., 8, 35, 10.1111/1467-9760.00093 · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00093
  84. Rosenfeld M, 1998, Habermas on Law and Democracy., 10.1525/9780520917613 · doi:10.1525/9780520917613
  85. Sandel M, 1996, Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy.
  86. 10.1177/0090591797025003002 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Scheuerman W. 1999. Between radicalism and resignation: democratic theory in Habermas's Between Facts and Norms . In Habermas: a Critical Reader , ed. P Dews, pp. 153–77. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  88. 10.1111/1467-9760.00119 · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00119
  89. 10.1080/135017699343487 · doi:10.1080/135017699343487
  90. 10.1111/1467-9248.00250 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Steiner J, 2004, Deliberative Politics in Action: Crossnational Study of Parliamentary Debates.
  93. 10.1111/0162-895X.00263 · DOI
  94. Sunstein C, 1993, The Partial Constitution.
  95. Sunstein C, 2001, Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do., 10.1093/oso/9780195145427.001.0001 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195145427.001.0001
  96. 10.1111/1467-9760.00148 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Teubner G, 1993, Law Soc. Rev., 17, 239, 10.2307/3053348 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1111/1467-9760.00069 · DOI
  99. 10.1017/CBO9781139170888 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1111/1467-8675.00203 · DOI
  101. 10.1017/CBO9780511521577.003 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511521577.003
  102. 10.1111/1468-2230.00375 · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00375
  103. Valadez JM, 2001, Deliberative Democracy: Political Legitimacy and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies.
  104. 10.2307/1964133 · DOI
  105. 10.1177/0090591702030005003 · doi:10.1177/0090591702030005003
  106. Weiler J, 1995, Eur. Law J., 1, 219, 10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x · DOI · Paper page
  107. White SK, 2000, Sustaining Affirmation: the Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory.
  108. 10.1093/019829770X.003.0005 · doi:10.1093/019829770x.003.0005
  109. Young I. 1996. Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. SeeBenhabib 1996, pp. 120–36 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,289

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, S.
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2003-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
307-326
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
DOI
10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
OpenAlex
W2100602508
Cited by
1,289
References
3
FWCI
49.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.