Cited by 195Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationEcology, Conservation, and Geographical StudiesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a swiss prealpine region

Open access
Stauffacher, Michael, Flüeler, Thomas, Krütli, Pius, Scholz, Roland W.·2008·Systemic Practice and Action Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P., & Scholz, R. W.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Stauffacher, Michael
Venue
Systemic Practice and Action Research
Published
2008-10-11
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
409-422
ISSN
  • 0894-9859 (ISSN-L)
  • 1094-429X
  • 1573-9295
OpenAlex
W2140169160
Cited by
195
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systemic Practice and Action Research (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
collaboration, stakeholder engagement, citizen participation, inclusive participation, transdisciplinary research, science-society collaboration, mutual learning, sustainable landscape development, Appenzell Ausserrhoden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review