The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training in Work Organizations
Abstract
This review examines issues and topics concerning systematic modes of instruction designed to produce environments that shape behavior to satisfy stated objectives. Training here is defined as the acquisition of skills, concepts, or attitudes that results in improved performance in an on-the-job environment. Even a cursory inspection of this review displays the diverse nature of literature in this field which includes such topics as: need assessment techniques, evaluation methodology, and particular modes of instruction; in addition, there are topics with social and political implications such as training for second careers and training hard-core unemployed youth. This is the first examination of the topic in this series since J. P. Campbell's (1971) review. Computer searches covering the period since his review produced over 3000 references from the Educational Resources Information Center and Psychological Abstracts bibliographic data bases. The resulting eye strain was partially alleviated by a set of informal decision rules which helped determine the materials read and considered for this review. First, consistent with the definition of training, the selection process emphasized topics related to systematic instruction designed to produce transfer in work organizations. Thus, topics that emphasized the development of basic principles in learning (e.g. massed vs spaced learning) were excluded unless the research was directly relevant to an instructional program for training purposes. Also, topics such as organization development which have implications for quality of work life and institutional effectiveness that extend beyond the considerations of most training programs were excluded as a separate topic. However, there is an attempt to describe relevant literature from a wide variety of disciplines which touch on many important developments. Therefore, this review examines discussions on such topics as criterion development, found in the educational psychology literature; need assessment methodology, developed in vocational education; and instructional systems approaches, evaluated in military environments. This review also attempts to conceptualize training issues broadly. It would have been possible to complete this article by examining only the different types of training approaches utilized. However, such an approach would have excluded many important issues that should affect our understanding of training as a system within a work organization. For example, it is possible to consider training as part of the socialization process. Also, it is important to consider training and its evaluation as an intervention which affects the lives of people in work organizations. This review attempts to provide such a perspective as well as examine the more traditional topics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study
Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90030-1 · Cited by 621
Essentials of Learning for Instruction
Gagné, R. M. (1988) · Cited by 464
The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation.
Messick, S. (1975) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.30.10.955 · Cited by 417
Personnel Training and Development
Campbell, J. P. (1971) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.22.020171.003025 · Cited by 310
Evaluation and control of training
Hamblin, A. C. (1974) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 291
Training in Business and Industry
Katzell, R. A., McGehee, W., & Thayer, P. W. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419299 · Cited by 279
Toward a taxonomy of human performance.
Fleishman, E. A. (1975) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.30.12.1127 · Cited by 265
Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior.
Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N., & Pursell, E. D. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.60.5.550 · Cited by 256
Kenny, D. A. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.82.3.345 · Cited by 241
Research Issues in Assertiveness Training.
Rich, A. R., & Schroeder, H. E. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.83.6.1084 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
BALDWIN, T. T., & FORD, J. K. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x · Cited by 3,307
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831
The science of training: a decade of progress
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · Cited by 1,703
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, I. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 229-272
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2109262595
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 21.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training in Work Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001305
- The paper
- Goldstein, I. L. (1980). Training in Work Organizations. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.