The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controllability and Predictability in Acquired Motivation
Abstract
CONTROL LABILITY AND UNCONTR OLLABILITY .. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exposure to Uncontrollable Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exposure to Controllable Stimulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Theories of the Effects of Control . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Frustration, Persistence, and Loss uf Cuntrol . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Control in Attachment Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Overlap between Controllability and Predictability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . PREDICTABILITY AND UNPREDICTABILITy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Preference for Predictability . . . . .. . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . Predictability, Kind of Information, and Coping Style . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of Unpredictability on Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of Control in Mediating the Effects of Predictability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Role of Unpredictability in the Proactive Effects of Un controllability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Role of Unpredictability ill Mediating Other Effects of UIlCOlltrollability ..... . .. . . . . . . Predictability and Tolerallce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTERACTI ONS OF PR EDICTION AND CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Trallsfer of Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Psychogenic Modification of Pain Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C ONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These effects are usually not found when the same aversive events or threats are predictable (Grillon et al., 2004; Mineka and Hendersen, 1985)”
From Phasic and sustained fear in humans elicits distinct patterns of brain activity (2011) · cites this paper as Mineka and Hendersen, 1985
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1963) · Scott, Foresman eBooks · doi:10.1037/14156-005 · Cited by 4,835
Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.
Taylor, S. E. (1983) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.38.11.1161 · Cited by 3,176
Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3 · Cited by 2,494
Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control.
Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5 · Cited by 2,192
Integrative activity of the brain
Konorski, J. (1967) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · Cited by 2,043
Failure to escape traumatic shock.
Seligman, M. E., & Maier, S. F. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024514 · Cited by 1,981
An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0036128 · Cited by 1,704
Gonzalez, R. C., & Mowrer, O. H. (1962) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419634 · Cited by 1,584
Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.
Averill, J. R. (1973) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0034845 · Cited by 1,570
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3524 · Cited by 2,007
Frijda, N. H. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.43.5.349 · Cited by 2,724
A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.
Bouton, M. E., Mineka, S., & Barlow, D. H. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.4 · Cited by 1,017
“…shows that the predictability versus unpredictability of uncontrollable events (possibly including panic attacks, cf. Craske et al., 1995) has a large impact on the amount of stress generated (e.g., Overmier, 1985; Seligman & Binik, 1977; J. Weiss, 1971; see Mineka & Hendersen, 1985, for a review).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Markovsky, B. (1996) · Cited by 994
Zahn‐Waxler, C., Klimes‐Dougan, B., & Slattery, M. J. (2000) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400003102 · Cited by 855
“…has been applied pressed parent are at substantial risk for depression, and risk increases further if bothto other species (Maier & Seligman, 1976; Mineka & Henderson, 1985), culminating in parents are affected (Birmaher, Ryan, Williamson, Brent, Kaufman, Dahl, Perel, & Nel-the “learned…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mineka, S., & Hendersen, R. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 495-529
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2175219552
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (RR 07030)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- controllability, predictability, uncontrollable events, frustration, persistence, loss of control, attachment relationships, unpredictability, motivational regulation, emotion regulation, self-regulation, goal regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Analgesia, Animals, Haplorhini, Association Learning, Avoidance Learning, Child, Child Development, Conditioning, Classical, Drug Tolerance, Frustration, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Object Attachment, Pain, Probability Learning, Psychology, Experimental, Research Design, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
